When it comes to international terrorism, there is a lot more that goes into it than crime detection, apprehension, and punishment so this is <u>FALSE</u>.
<h3>What are organized responses to international terrorism?
</h3>
International terrorism is quite complicated and requires more processes to be resolved than crime detection, apprehension, and punishment.
Sometimes it isn't possible to detect the crimes early enough and even when you do, there are political barriers to apprehension.
In conclusion, this is false.
Find out more on terrorism at brainly.com/question/1490223.
The criteria that law must meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate includes"
- It must further a compelling government interest
- It must use the least restrictive means to achieve its purpose.
<h3>What is a
strict scrutiny test?</h3>
In law, a strict scrutiny refers to the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. In order for a law to pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest" and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.
This standard is the highest and most of the stringent standard of judicial review and is part of the levels of judicial scrutiny that courts use to determine whether a constitutional right or principle should give way to the government's interest against observance of the principle. However, the lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny and these standards are applied to statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.
Read more about strict scrutiny
brainly.com/question/14671704
#SPJ1
A fine. Ranging from $500-$1000, but some individual state laws may predict differently.
Answer:
It is the duty of Congress to have hearings in order to confirm a Supreme Court Justice nominee (as stated in the Constitution). This exclusive power rests on the U.S. Senate. The consensus, however, may be different and may vote against a nominee. Political parties within the Senate generally get in the way of who will vote and who won't, and vice-versa.
Explanation:
For example, Merrick Garland (former President Obama's nominee) was not given a hearing. Furthermore, Congress failed to perform the duties to have a hearing and decide whether to vote or deny a nominee. This is an example of how they refused to even vote on him. This is not the way government should operate.
