1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frez [133]
4 years ago
13

Why is it relatively easy for firms to enter and leave a monopolistically competitive market?

History
1 answer:
VashaNatasha [74]4 years ago
7 0

A monopolistically competitive market is, by definition, constituted by a large number of firms that compete producing diferenced versions of a product. Such companies are not price-takers and they hold certain degree of power market and of control over the pricing decisions.

However, in a market that comprises so many actors in its supply side, the market power is splitted in many small units and the amount exercised by each is not very strong. Firms operating in this market structure do not have enough power to affect their rivals through their internal decisions and also not enough power to affect potential competitors and to prevent their entrance. They cannot set entry barriers to prevent the entrance of new companies in the market.

You might be interested in
True or false discrimination against people with disabilities would not be addressed until 1973
Schach [20]

True.

alskdjaslkdjaslkasjld kjaslksajlaskdj aslkjasl kjadlkasjdlskajdalskdjaslkdjl kasjdlkasdlas kd

3 0
3 years ago
Describe the power-sharing arrangement between Congress and the President on the issues of war and national defense.
DedPeter [7]

Congress creates military and funds it but President controls troop movements, only Congress can declare war, but President can start armed conflicts, and "The War Powers Act" limits the President's so he cannot keep troops fighting without Congress' Approval.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A carpenter wants to cut a 7-meters plank into equal parts. If he takes one minute per cut, how long will it take him?
Sloan [31]

Answer: i’m guessing 7

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Identify two effects of the Glorious Revolution on the English monarchy.
Bogdan [553]
In the glorious revolution the English monarcy was overthrown for 30 plus years but it came back after parliament realized that it is ok to have a king or queen but not to give them to much power
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can yall pick three below and explain what they are please?
Mashutka [201]

Answer: Nullification Crisis

The nullification crisis

was a United States sectional political crisis in 1832–33, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, which involved a confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government. It ensued after South Carolina declared that the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional and therefore null and void within the sovereign boundaries of the state.

National Bank veto

veto According to the History Channel, President Andrew Jackson vetoed a new charter for the Second Bank of the United States because the bank was heavily biased toward business interests and had no congressional oversight. This bias led the bank to not support western expansion, which Jackson favored. Jackson also felt that the bank was too powerful, both politically and economically.

Maysville Road veto

The Maysville Road veto occurred on May 27, 1830, when United States President Andrew Jackson vetoed a bill that would allow the federal government to purchase stock in the Maysville, Washington, Paris, and Lexington Turnpike Road Company, which had been organized to construct a road linking Lexington, Kentucky, to Maysville on the Ohio River, the entirety of which would be in the state of Kentucky. Its advocates regarded it as a part of the national Cumberland Road system. Congress passed a bill in 1830 providing federal funds to complete the project. Jackson vetoed the bill on the grounds that federal funding of intrastate projects of this nature was unconstitutional. He declared that such bills violated the principle that the federal government should not be involved in local economic affairs. Jackson also pointed out that funding for these kinds of projects interfered with paying off the national debt.

Explanation: cause god is good

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the basic aim in direct democracy??
    9·2 answers
  • How did the scopes trial went down
    9·1 answer
  • How did the political parties affect voter turnout when they were stonger?
    5·2 answers
  • What part of america is the united states?
    7·2 answers
  • Who was Chiang Kai-Shek? (pls help)
    6·2 answers
  • What does Mr. Butler say people thought about the
    12·2 answers
  • one problem that the U.S. was having with another country during the time that Washington was president.
    11·2 answers
  • One of the societal pressures of the 1950s was conformity. In what way were
    8·2 answers
  • How did Hitler rapidly conquer Western and Eastern Europe?
    12·1 answer
  • Which following was hitlers first violation of the treaty of Versailles
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!