An intentional community being studied by sociologists would notice different behaviors, management, and relationships in each. The communities share common goals and interests which make them be together. In a way these communities help people grow and develop with the others inside it.
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
Answer:
Australia ( may not be right because even though it is the smallest and south of the equator I don't know if it's an island.. maybe try to word the question differently and I can help more lol)
and I can help more lol)Explanation:
It is South of the equator, and the smallest in landmass, and is also an island.
Answer: Charismatic leaders are self confident and charming
.
Transformational leaders use ideas to gain support
.
Explanation:
Charismatic leaders are interesting people to whom people are naturally drawn. They use this skill to lead people, knowing that they give off a sense of self confidence that inspires the confidence of others. In contrast, transformational leaders find a shared value or idea and use that to gain the support of their followers.
The two styles are similar in the sense that they both gain the support of followers, and are effective methods of leadership.
The difference between the two styles is the driving force, while charismatic leadership is built around the leader, transformational leadership is around an idea, and it usually involves the input of the other members of the team, not just the leader.
The teacher gives a link so you can watch the video again. I know of Jared Diamond from his books. I have not seen this video before & would need to watch it too in order to help you.
