Answer: $220,000
Explanation:
Using the Accrual Method of Accounting means that revenue is only to be recorded when it is earned i.e. when services have been delivered.
Any revenue received when the services have not been delivered will be recorded as Unearned Revenue.
With $528,000 in subscription revenue, the monthly subscription is;
= 528,000/12
= $44,000
From June to December would be 7 months so they would have earned;
= 44,000 * 7
= $308,000
The amount that they have not earned but have received would therefore be;
= 528,000 - 308,000
= $220,000
<em>This amount will be recorded after they finish deliveries of magazines in next year May. </em>
Answer:
10.45%
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the cost of debt
B/S = 1.57 − 1
B/S = .57
.156 = .14 + .57(1 −.21)(.14 − RB)
.156 = .14 + .57(.79)(.14 − RB)
RB = .1045*100
RB= 10.45%
Therefore the cost of debt is 10.45%
Answer:
STARK COMPANY
INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
PARTICULARS AMOUNT$
Service Revenue 20,000
<u>Less-Expenses</u>
Supplies expense 200
Interest expense 500
Insurance expense 1800
Utilities expense 1300
Depreciation expense 2000
Wages expense 7500
Total expenses <u>13,300</u>
Net profit <u>$6,700</u>
STARK COMPANY
STATEMENT OF RETAINED EARNINGS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 Amount$
Retained earnings December 31 prior year end 14,800
Add- Net income 6,700
Less- Dividends 3,000
Retained earnings, December 31 Current year end $18,500
Answer:
Jobs argument
Explanation:
-The national-security argument states that some industries have to be protected by imposing tariffs to maintain the local production in case of a war.
-The unfair-competition argument says that the domestic market has to be protected when there is unfair competition because companies from other countries are subject to different regulations.
-Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument states that the threat of imposing a restriction can help to eliminate a restriction that was imposed by another country.
-Infant-industry argument says that new industries have to be protected because they don't have economies of scales that their competitors from others countries have.
-The jobs argument claims that the trade with other countries eliminates the local jobs.
According to this, the answer is that the senator is using the jobs argument to argue for the trade restriction on steel rods because he claims that it is necessary to impose those restrictions to protect the workers from losing their jobs.
