The answer is “food tampering”.
Tampering can allude to numerous types of treachery
yet the term is regularly used to mean deliberate modification of
items in a way that would make them destructive to the purchaser. This risk has
provoked makers to make items that are either hard to change or if nothing else
hard to adjust without notifying the customer.
Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
Answer: Self fulfilling prophecy
Explanation: Due to the fact that Luis did poorly in the exam, which gave the teacher the impression that Luis was lazy and unintelligent. According to Symbolic interactionists, every grade or behaviour indicates how one should be assessed, in this case Luis, thus labelling individual students. Lewis was labelled as lazy and unintelligent because of bad exam here.
After that, the teacher started paying only negative attention to Louis, he saw him as lazy, so he judged his behaviour as lazy, and saw him as unintelligent, based on the grade on the exam.
Based on the teacher's negative attention to Luis, Lewis begins to lose interest in school, which is self fulfilling prophecy. When a person, student, or event is expected to do something concrete, say, something as bad as in this case, then it is most likely that that person or student will "fulfil prophetic expectations" and begin to behave in a bad way.
Answer:
This is a bit too little to go off of. But I'm gonna guess D.
Also, what do you mean by "Text to speechSaved at 08:57 AM?" xd
