Answer:
a. a majority of both shareholders and directors must approve.
Explanation:
Whenever a corporation decides to dispose off all of it's assets or substantially all of it's assets to another corporation, following points are noteworthy
- The Board of directors first have to propose a resolution regarding disposition which has to be approved
- Secondly post approval of the said resolution, the act of "disposition" also requires approval by the corporation's shareholders.
- Such approval must be obtained by majority of the votes cast in it's favor.
In short, disposition of all or substantially all the assets requires an approval of a majority of both shareholders and directors.
Other things remaining constant, increased US imports will <u>D. Tend to cause the </u><u>dollar</u><u> to depreciate</u> because the world supply of dollars will rise.
<h3>What is the implication of increased United States imports with other factors constant?</h3>
With increased imports by the United States, and if all other factors are held constant, the supply of dollars will increase.
When the supply of dollars increases without a corresponding increase in demand, the dollar will depreciate or lose its value relatively.
Thus, if other things remain constant, increased US imports will <u>D. Tend to cause the </u><u>dollar</u><u> to depreciate</u> because the world supply of dollars will rise.
Learn more about exchange rates at brainly.com/question/2202418
Answer:
3) The only bank in a small town
Explanation:
By definition a monopoly occurs when there is only one supplier in the market for a specific good or service. In this case, if there is only one bank that works in a small town, then that bank has a monopoly of all the town's residents that require banking services. If any resident doesn't like that specific bank, they need to go to another town in search for banking services.
Answer: d. internal rate of return
Explanation:
The Internal Rate of Return can be a very useful method for measuring the viability of a product because it takes into account the magnitude and timing of cashflows when it discounts it to the current period to find out if it will lead to a higher NPV than zero.
The other methods have their limitation. The payback period does not take into account the entire lifetime but rather stops as soon as the project pays back and the other two do not take into account the timing of the cashflows.
