The correct answer is - D. It was widely agreed that a traditional invasion of Japan would drag the war on for years and lead to may, may more deaths than the atomic bomb.
The US officials decided to use the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan because of two reasons. The first and more important one was to put an end to the war as quickly and efficiently as possible, minimizing the deaths of their troops as much as possible. The second one was to create an image of a country that reached a level of global military power, in order to boost its global reputation and cause fear at other nations.
Both of those things worked out very fine for the USA. They ended the war with Japan in no time, and they gained a status of a global military powerhouse.
Hiroshima I think.
It was used to end world war 2.
"<span>Coming to the spoken language, the </span>Mughals<span> spoke Chagatai Turkic language, which is not of the </span>same<span> family which </span>Mongolian<span> language belongs to. With respect to descent, the first </span>Mughal<span> emperor, Babur, claimed direct descent from Genghis Khan, a </span>Mongol<span> and Timur, a Turk."
- Google</span>
I am confused about your question, because neither Truman or Eisenhower were around when Vietnam was happening...
If you clarify, I might be able to answer your question
Answer:
Unfortunately for these new settlers, Sir Thomas Gates, Virginia's deputy governor, bound for the colony, was shipwrecked in Bermuda and did not assume his new post until 1610. When he arrived, he found only a fraction of the colonists had survived the infamous "Starving Time" of 1609-1610. All too soon, the Mother Country learned of Virginia's woeful state. The result was predictable: financial catastrophe for the Company. Many new subscribers reneged payment on their shares, and the Company became entangled in dozens of court cases. On top of these losses, the Company was forced to incur further debt when it sent hundreds more colonists to Virginia.
