The given statement is True.
When physically attractive people are also assumed to be smarter and nicer. The perception distortion, Halo Effect, occurs.
Explanation:
When an overall impression of a person creates an influence upon our thinking towards that person, then his this impression also influence our evaluations towards him. For example, if he is nice(overall impression), then we assume that he is smarter too(evaluation about his personality).
We use this effect in product or service as well. If we like a product due to its overall good impression of usage, then we also assume that it is good for other purposes as well. For example, if we like a cell phone due to its brand and usage flexibility, then we also evaluate that this phone will also produce the best quality photos and videos.
In simple words, we can say, if we like something, we like every aspect of that thing regardless of the true picture of that thing.
Learn more about the Halo Effect at:
brainly.com/question/12108780
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
first one is a and second is a greek history and mythology is my thing
Explanation:
Answer:
remains her separate property unless commingled
Explanation:
The property that is owned by any of the spouse before their marriage is considered as their separate property. The property is shared with both the spouse after their marriage. Upon divorce, the other spouse may have some right over the total property. The property owner prior to the marriage is not subject to distribution and division.
In the given excerpt, the property owner by Janet was before her marriage. After her marriage with Jorge, this particular property do not possess any right to him.
Answer:
About 2,040 years
Explanation:
Count the number of years between 30 BCE and 2009. You want the number of years between 30 BCE and 2019. 30 BCE to 0 CE is 30 years, and from 0 CE to 2009 is another 2009 years. 0 CE itself is also one year. So about 2,040 years!
Answer:
The french government's subsidies to french farmers justify restriction on American imports of french agriculture products
Explanation:
It refers to the idea or argument is which free trade can be desirable if the countries involved in the market are playing by the same rules and conditions. It also says that rivalry in trade and commerce is dishonest. It is considered as well as an unethical practice due to the restrictions that can avoid the generation of innovative services.
