1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
love history [14]
3 years ago
10

4. 200 mL of a 5.6M solution to BaCl_2 have 750 mL of water added to it. What is the new concentration?

Chemistry
1 answer:
IceJOKER [234]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

4. 1.18 mol·L⁻¹

14. See below.

Explanation:

4. Dilution calculation

V₁c₁ = V₂c₂

Data:

V₁ = 200 mL; c₁ = 5.6 mol·L⁻¹

V₂ = 950 mL; c₂ = ?

Calculation:

c₂ = c₁ × V₁/V₂

c₂ = 5.6 mol·L⁻¹ × (200/950) = 1.18 mol·L⁻¹

The new concentration is 1.18 mol·L⁻¹ .

14. Boyle's Law graphs

We can write Boyle's Law as

pV = k or p = k/V or V= k/p

p and V are inversely related.

(a) As pressure increases, volume decreases. Thus, a graph of V vs p is a hyperbola.

(b) p = k/V =k(1/V)

 1/V = (1/k)p

   y  =   m x  + 0

A graph of 1/V vs p is a straight line.

You might be interested in
The _________ indicates that 70% of the Sun's radiation is contained on Earth and 30% is reflected back into space.
vichka [17]

i think it would be  Earth's albedo hope this helps

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5. What concentration of acid must be added to change the pH of 1 mM phosphate buffer from 7.4 to 7.3 (pKas of the phosphate buf
mr_godi [17]

Explanation:

According to the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, the relation between pH and pK_{a} is as follows.

               pH = pK_{a} + log \frac{base}{acid}

where,     pH = 7.4 and pK_{a} = 7.21

As here, we can use the pK_{a} nearest to the desired pH.

So,      7.4 = 7.21 + log \frac{base}{acid}

             0.19 = log \frac{base}{acid}

            \frac{base}{acid} = 1.55

1 mM phosphate buffer means [HPO_{4}] + [H_{2}PO_{4}] = 1 mM

Therefore, the two equations will be as follows.

           \frac{HPO_{4}}{H_{2}PO_{4}} = 1.55 ............. (1)

  [HPO_{4}] + [H_{2}PO_{4}] = 1 mM ........... (2)        

Now, putting the value of [HPO_{4}] from equation (1) into equation (2) as follows.

             1.55[H_{2}PO_{4}] + [tex][H_{2}PO_{4}] = 1 mM

                        2.55 [H_{2}PO_{4}] = 1 mM

                             [H_{2}PO_{4}] = 0.392 mM

Putting the value of [H_{2}PO_{4}] in equation (1) we get the following.

                     0.392 mM + [HPO_{4}] = 1 mM

                          [HPO_{4}] = (1 - 0.392) mM

                              [HPO_{4}] = 0.608 mM

Thus, we can conclude that concentration of the acid must be 0.608 mM.

7 0
3 years ago
Which is a heterogeneous mixture?
Valentin [98]

Answer:

I think no C or D

if wrong correct me plsssssss

Mark me brainliest plsss

Explanation:

December 21 marks the winter solstice in the Northern Hemisphere, but in 2020 the longest night of the year is also going to be a witness to an incredible astronomic event known as the “great conjunction”. ... This rare double planet sighting–or “Great Conjunction”–can be viewed from anywhere around the globe

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5 properties of acids
Dahasolnce [82]

Answer:

   Acids change the color of litmus from blue to red.

   They convert the color of Methyl Orange from Orange/Yellow to Pink.

   Acids turn the pink color of Phenolphthalein to colourless.

   Acids can conduct electricity.

   Some Acids are highly corrosive in nature which means that they corrode or rust metals.

Explanation:

hope this helped

ur boi johnny joestar.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One question please help!
Agata [3.3K]
<span>1 trial : you have nothing to compare the result with - you don't know if it's a mistake.
2 trials : you can compare results - if very different, one may have gone wrong, but which one?
3 trials : if 2 results are close and 3rd far away, 3rd probably unreliable and can be rejected.

******************************

First calculate the enthalpy of fusion. M, C and m,c = mass and specific heat of calorimeter and water; n, L = mass and heat of fusion of ice; T = temperature fall.

L = (mc+MC)T/n.

c=4.18 J/gK. I assume calorimeter was copper, so C=0.385 J/gK.

1. M = 409g, m = 45g. T = 22c, n = 14g
L = (45*4.18+409*0.385)*22/14 = 543.0 J/g.

2. M = 409g, m = 49g, T = 20c, n = 13g
L = (49*4.18+409*0.385)*20/13 = 557.4 J/g.

3. M = 409g, m = 54g, T = 20c, n = 14g
L = (54*4.18+409*0.385)*20/14 = 547.4 J/g.

(i) Estimate error in L from spread of 3 results.
Average L = 549.3 J/g.
average of squared differences (variance) = (6.236^2+8.095^2+1.859^2)/3 = 35.96
standard deviation = 5.9964
standard error = SD/(N-1) = 5.9964/2 = 3 J/g approx.

% error = 3/547 x 100% = 0.5%.

(ii) Estimate error in L from accuracy of measurements:
error in masses = +/-0.5g
error in T = +/-0.5c

For Trial 3
M = 409g, error = 0.5g
m = 463-409, error = sqrt(0.5^2+0.5^2) = 0.5*sqrt(2)
n =(516-463)-(448-409)=14, error = 0.5*sqrt(4) = 1.0g
K = (mc+MC)=383, error = sqrt[2*(0.5*4.18)^2+(0.5*0.385)^2] = 2.962

L = K*T/n
% errors are
K: 3/383 x 100% = 0.77
T: 0.5/20 x 100% = 2.5
n: 1.0/14 x 100% = 7.14

% errors in K and T are << error in n, so we can ignore them.
% error in L = same as in n = 7% x 547.4 = 40 (always round final error to 1 sig fig).

*************************************

The result is (i) L= 549 +/- 3 J/g or (ii) L = 550 +/- 40 J/g.
Both are very far above accepted figure of 334 J/g, so there is at least one systematic error in the experiment or the calculations.
eg calorimeter may not be copper, so C is not 0.385 J/gK. (If it was polystyrene, which absorbs/ transmits little heat, the effective value of C would be very low, reducing L.)
Using +/- 40 is probably best (more cautious).
However, the spread in the actual results is much smaller; try to explain this discrepancy - eg
* measurements were "fiddled" to get better results; other Trials were made but only best 3 were chosen.
* measurements were more accurate than I assumed (eg masses to nearest 0.1g but rounded to 1g when written down).

Other sources of error:
L=(mc+MC)T/n is too high, so n (ice melted) may be too small, or T (temp fall) too high - why?
* it is suspicious that all final temperatures were 0c - was this actually measured or just guessed? a higher final temp would reduce L.
* we have assumed initial and final temperature of ice was 0c, it may actually have been colder, so less ice would melt - this could explain small values of n
* some water might have been left in container when unmelted ice was weighed (eg clinging to ice) - again this could explain small n;
* poor insulation - heat gained from surroundings, melting more ice, increasing n - but this would reduce measured L below 334 J/g not increase it.
* calorimeter still cold from last trial when next one started, not given time to reach same temperature as water - this would reduce n.
Hope This Helps :)
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Magnesium wants to have 8 electrons, so it ____________ 2 electrons to another atom, so its valence shell is full and a ________
    6·1 answer
  • you are given 500 mL of a 5M stock solution of ammonium chloride but for your experiment, you only need 100 mL of a 0.65M soluti
    6·1 answer
  • 3
    13·1 answer
  • At the beginning of the experiment, the aspirin pill contains 325 mg of acetylsalicylic acid and weighs 400 mg. at the end of ex
    8·1 answer
  • Water’s boiling point would be close to
    5·1 answer
  • From which plant can benzoic acid be obtained from?​
    11·1 answer
  • Does this change in temperature of the water and the mixing of liquids in the calorimeter represent an increase or decrease in e
    15·1 answer
  • Dioxin is a by-product of various industrial chemical processes. It is suspected of causing cancer and birth defects in both hum
    15·2 answers
  • 2. HBIO3 name this acid.​
    11·1 answer
  • Why are being flammable and combustible considered to be chemical properties and not physical properties?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!