Employees who demonstrate divided loyalty or allegiance to the u.s. may attempt to access sensitive information without what?

1 answer:

8 0

The answer is C) Authorization

To access sensitive government documents and data, there is a proper procedure that needs to be followed. This includes, getting the authorization of high ranked officials, who will give permission and authorize access to sensitive data.

In the past, employees of the US government, who have divide loyalties would access these documents without going through a proper authorization channel.

This is a criminal offense and an act of treachery

You might be interested in

Can someone answer these questions... for this article

fiasKO [112]

Answer:

This article is about the parents of DACA children who would have, under the proposed policy, be eligible to some protections so they could stay in the United States.

The event took place in Washington DC at the Supreme Court.

The event was a vote by the Justices of the Supreme Court on June 23 during the last summer of Obama's administration.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

He has done his homework.(interrogative)

Inessa [10]

Answer:

has he done his homework?

8 0

3 years ago

In this excerpt from President Kennedy's 1963 Civil Rights Address, he included the examples of President Lincoln's efforts to e

OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

To explain the bonds of injustice.

Explanation:

He states in the passage that even though President Lincoln freed the slaves, the "bonds of injustice" are still present. He states how economic and social oppression are still going on, so this means that not all citizens are free. The injustice is still after the slaves supposedly are freed.

7 0

3 years ago

When he became president of the Confederacy, Jefferson Davis believed that

anastassius [24]

Answer:

Hi!

The answer to the question is option D, Lincoln would force states that seceded back into the Union.

Explanation:

Jefferson Davis had the believe that Lincoln would force states that withdrew from the federal union to go back to the former union that existed.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Barbour and Wright maintain that when the Supreme Court issues a ruling on the constitutionality of a particular bureaucratic re

MArishka [77]

Barbour and Wright maintain that when the Supreme Court issues a ruling on the constitutionality of a particular bureaucratic regulation, they are "piecemeal".

Explanation:

It is a piecemeal approach accompanied by unsystematic, partial actions taken over periods. A piecemeal judgment is a document provided by an external auditor expressing a view confined to particular line elements within the financial statements of a corporation. In a situation where complete information is not accessible, an auditor can offer a piecemeal opinion.

For an instance, the defendants pursued a piecemeal investigation strategy in the patent infringement case, examining only the records of selected corporate employees. The district court stated that the method was contradictory to the Federal regulations of Civil Procedure and repeated court orders.

8 0

3 years ago