<u>Ethics and morals</u> refer to our beliefs about what is right vs. wrong, good vs. evil, virtuous vs. corrupt. Read more about ethics and morals.
<h3>What are considered as standard ethics and morals?</h3>
Ethics and morals conform to “right” and “wrong” conduct. While they can be used interchangeably, they are as well different.
<h3>What are the differences in ethics and morals?</h3>
Ethics refer to rules provided by an external source, e.g., codes of conduct in workplaces or principles in religions. Moral, on the other hand, refer to an individual's own principles regarding right and wrong.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about ethics and morals: brainly.com/question/1326871
#SPJ12
Thou have to much recoil and the west Morgan the west Morgan game and play
Answer: Legal- rational Leadership style
Explanation:
The rational-legal style also known as transactional leadership is when a leader exercises control and authority on the basis of his knowledge to his subordinates.
Transactional leader is someone who values order and structure based on rules and regulations to complete task on time. Transactional leaders do not encourage personal creativity and innovative ideas because They depend on people who work well in a structured, directed environment ruled by influence and control.
Their main focus is on RESULTS, conformity to the existing structure of an organization and measures success based on the organization’s system of rewards and penalties. This type of leader is responsible for maintaining routine by managing and monitoring individual and group performance.
This type of leader sets the criteria for their workers according to existing defined requirements. Performance reviews are the most common way to judge employee performance.
Transactional leaders differ from other leaders like the charismatic and transformational leaders in that it is only results oriented.
In a nut shell, the legal rational Leadership style focuses on the give and take style based on controlling the performance of the individual and determining how well he or she can deliver in a structured environment.
We can then infer that the boss follows the legal-rational leadership style.
I truly think that the beat way we can improve nationality and a better sense of comunity for america is sticking together
Tom refused to accept Sam's input and change his attitude. Interestingly, the input provided by Sam further strengthened Tom's initial attitude. This is an example of a: <u>contrast effect</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
A contrast effect is the term used in psychology to explain the aggravation or decline, cognition or related performance as a result of consecutive or simultaneous exposure to a stimulus of lesser or greater value in the same dimension.
The type of contrast depends upon the how the participant considers a situation. There are two types of contrast effect. They are
i) Positive contrast effect
ii) Negative contrast effect
In the above scenario, Tom and Sam were discussing about the tax rates. Conflict arises between them when Sam objects Tom’s view on tax rates. Tom got aggravated and strengthened his attitude.
