Answer:
The main reason, which is the major similarity between the fall of Roman Empire and Han China is because of trade problem which led to increase in taxes. As the taxes were increased, the low class and the middle class had to fight for survival and maltreatment.
Explanation:
ROMAN EMPIRE:
The great Roman Empire was founded in the year 27 BC and later fell or was later dissolved in the year 1453, on the 29th day of the month of May(476 AD).
With the establishment of the Roman empire many cultures and "soft" technologies were introduced.
HAN OF CHINA:
The Han dynasty operated on the monarchy type of Government and it is one of the biggest and longest China dynasty as many Chinese till today still refer to themselves as the "Hans".
SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE END OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE AND THE HAN DYNASTY OF CHINA.
- Both were great and powerful empires.
- they both relied on trade for their Economy. When the trades in the respective empires fell, the Economy fell too, so there is the need for tax Increament. When the tax was Increased, more levies were levied on the poor masses and this lead to them fighting the injustice.
<span>The best answer for this question would definitely be: A. Greece is west of mesopotamia This is geographically correct since the area of which Mesopotamia was in the past had relations with Greece before. In which greece is a mountainous area with cities and states, it is possible that they were influenced as well. </span>
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice. The map you specified indicates that countries <span>collaborate with other countries to reach goals for reducing environmental emissions. </span><span>I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!</span>
With the influx of people to urban centers came the increasingly obvious problem of city layouts. The crowded streets which were, in some cases, the same paths as had been "naturally selected" by wandering cows in the past were barely passing for the streets of a quarter million commuters. In 1853, Napoleon III named Georges Haussmann "prefect of the Seine," and put him in charge of redeveloping Paris' woefully inadequate infrastructure (Kagan, The Western Heritage Vol. II, pp. 564-565). This was the first and biggest example of city planning to fulfill industrial needs that existed in Western Europe. Paris' narrow alleys and apparently random placement of intersections were transformed into wide streets and curving turnabouts that freed up congestion and aided in public transportation for the scientists and workers of the time. Man was no longer dependent on the natural layout of cities; form was beginning to follow function. Suburbs, for example, were springing up around major cities
