Fluent aphasia, in which the victim has difficulty comprehending language but is still able to speak smoothly, is due to damage that includes damage extending into the thalamus or basal ganglia.
<h3>
What is Wernicke aphasia?</h3>
- Aphasia is a language function impairment that is limited to the dominant brain hemisphere.
- Aphasia is traditionally classified as either expressive (Broca) or receptive (Wernicke).
- Many people have a combination of the two types of aphasia. Wernicke aphasia is described in this article (also called receptive aphasia).
- This illness, which is marked by reduced language comprehension, was initially recognised by German physician Carl Wernicke in 1874.
learn more about Wernicke aphasia refer:
brainly.com/question/13251890
#SPJ4
Nepal is loosing it's equality manpower .justify
Answer:
the answer is
Explanation:
generate support for the war effort and boost morale through the media.
<3 hoped it helppppp
Answer and Explanation:
The Supreme Court concluded that the plaintiffs (black children) have been denied their rights because, by segregating them from white children, the state laws that legitimized such segregation and established different public schools for white and black children, contravenes the Fourteenth Amendment which guarantees equality and equal protection of the law.
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
