Natural monopolies and the reason to exist in the free market system
Explanation:
In a natural monopoly when a market can supply goods or the cost of the goods can be lowered in competition with the potential competitor then it is called as natural monopoly. In a market when the first supplier of the product is demanding more cost or raises the costs of the product then it eventually rises to natural monopoly.
Here the products are given at a lower rate than the capital supplier. They are available in free market because people always tend to go for lower prices and for a good quality product.
Programs in which anyone who meets the criteria is eligible to participate are called Contributory programs. Contribution-based systems, such as those seen in Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment insurance, require contributors to the program for beneficiaries to be eligible. The federal government has a wide range of entitlement programs that are all intended to give individuals financial assistance.
<h3>
What is a contributory program?</h3>
The majority of people who hear the term immediately conjure up contributions-based schemes like Social Security or social insurance. In exchange for receiving financial benefits once they reach retirement age, these welfare programs in the US demand that workers contribute a percentage of their salary.
<h3>
What is the difference between contributory and noncontributory programs?</h3>
- Contributory - Plans for group life insurance where the company pays the majority of the premium and the employee "contributes" a portion of it those.
- Noncontributory - Group life insurance policies are ones in which the company pays the full premium cost and the employee makes no payment toward the premiums.
Learn more about Contributory programs: brainly.com/question/13986235
#SPJ4
Answer: Frame-up
Explanation:
This is the act in which false evidence is given about someone in order to falsely accuse them of the crime that they did not commit, usually this is done by the actual person who committed the crime in order to dogde the punishment whilst others take their fall.
We see the publicists above (who represents the actor who is allegedly accused) saying the woman are just doing these sexual claims for money gains , by doing this they are shifting the focus from the real perpetrator to put the blame on the women; to say they are the guilty one because they were driven by extortion.
They are trying to bring evidence that will make these woman look guilty.
I don't think so probably not but maybe.. just maybe :l
