The federalist papers wanted to present to the people how a strong central government would be useful to the people and the union and how it could protect them from both foreign and domestic threats. The anti-federalists opposed this and claimed that a strong federal government could easily become tyrannical and become just like the European ones. The founding documents thus tried to find a compromise between these two stances.
Answer:
1. industrial pollution
2. people who were dumped in the river or buried on the banks after their families could not afford a proper cremation.
Explanation:
i hope this helps?
Answer:
Check kiter.
Explanation:
What the exercise describes is a form of fraud commited with checks. The check kiter would take advantage of the float to make use of funds (that do not exist) in a bank account transforming a check in a form of unauthorized credit, like the exercise examplifies: Out of 2 accounts, you issue a check that overdraws their accout at bank 1, and then deposits a check in that account from their bank 2 to cover the first check. You "abuse" the float to make use of funds that don't exist.
Identical twins are two people born at the same time from the same person that look alike. The difference is they may develop is in personality from different experiences but usually they have different birthmarks
Answer:
C. State constitutions guaranteed individual liberties.
Explanation:
The 1787 ratification of the Constitution of the United States was one of the major issues of discord between the supporters and opposers of the process. They are known as the Federalists and anti-Federalists.
The main argument of the Anti-federalists was that the federal government will have a massive hold over the people and restrict or minimize individual freedom. They believed that this new Constitution will lead to tyranny and reduce the powers of the state. To them, they wanted the division of power between the national and state governments, for a strong national government will only give more power to the President and individual state powers will lead to oppression. So, their argument was for a state government that will guarantee and allow individual liberties.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
