The answer to this question is false
Answer:
Well since you haven't shared the passage it makes this hard. But you can rule out B and D because buildings and huge cities have nothing to do with agriculture. But they did practice intercropping so I would go with C.
Explanation:
Answer:
The federal is experiencing deflection and the economy is heading to a turpsy turvy.
Answer:
Ted Bundy left the teeth marks on the victim of Chi Omega's murder. This evidence was presented at the court and the match was found between the mark and Bundy's teeth. He was convinced for all the crimes, even though previous witness reports were often dismissed.
Explanation:
In the historic case of serial killer Ted Bundy, the physical evidence was crucial that determined his connection to the crime.
While there was already evidence from testimonies that Bundy can be connected to the various murders that he committed, including evidence of women who saw him leave with the weapon, the physical evidence was crucial at the end.
There were bite marks on one of the victim’s body, and the court insisted to compare those to the casting of Bundy’s teeth. He protested first, probably knowing there will be the match. As suspected,<u> the mark proved to be complementary with the cast of Bundy’s teeth, and a forensic odontologist confirmed the match.</u> Bundy’s teeth were chipped and misaligned, just like the ones that left the mark on the body. This was the only physical evidence found at the scene and it proved to be the crucial one. <u>Bundy was convicted of the murders and crimes he committed.</u>
We can see how crucial physical evidence here is, as Bundy was suspected before for various crimes,<u> even turned in by his girlfriend - his name, car, and appearance matched the records given by the victims and witnesses. </u>However, they were often dismissed by the police and attributed to the emotions and shock. <u>Yet, with this kind of hard physical evidence, it was finally determined Ted Bundy was the one who attacked and murdered the women.</u>
The reason why one case of influenza does not confer lifelong immunity is that the virus tends to mutate overtime which makes it unrecognizable to the immune system.
<h3>Why is it difficult to get immunity to influenza?</h3>
Influenza is caused by a virus which tends to mutate overtime in order to stay ahead of medical technology.
As a result, this mutation makes the original virus unrecognizable to the immune system which would then be unable to fight it.
Find out more on natural immunity at brainly.com/question/21480961
#SPJ1
