<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the "objectivity" of the researcher, since quantitative data is often indisputable from an objective sense, whereas qualitative data can be interpreted in different ways. </span></span>
Answer:
you could use the microarray technology to see which genes his cancer cells have increased, lessened, turned on, or turned off.
Explanation:
Microarray technology is a unique tool used almost exclusively in molecular biology, since it is able of counting hundreds or thousands of gene transcripts from a specific cell or tissue sample at the same time. Therefore based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario you could use the microarray technology to see which genes his cancer cells have increased, lessened, turned on, or turned off.
Answer:
The right option which is the best option to be taken by the Congress is to impeach the Supreme Court judges for their opinions which is option 3.
Explanation:
Removing someone from the Court would require an investigation and formal charges by the House Judiciary Committee, a majority vote in the House, a trial in the Senate, and a two-thirds majority.
This approach would need extremely compelling grounds for removal in order to gain support from more than 20 Republicans. As a practical matter, the House would need new information such as abuse of office, financial improprieties, or further evidence of sexual assault or perjury to provide the basis for removal, while the search for material would itself be easily criticized as partisan. .
Probably yes tbh i mean i would say yes not sure
<span>Critical
thinking involves the engagement of the thinker in rational deliberation and a
systematic or methodical investigation of facts and reasons. Such postulations
normally consist of a number of premises and a conclusion. The premises provide
reasons in support of the conclusion or position taken by the argument. This
can facilitate rational evaluation of philosophical claims.</span>
