Answer:
B-Enables workers to learn a variety of skolls
Explanation:
Answer:
Their earnings per share may decrease.
Explanation:
Shareholders of a company may be reluctant to finance expansion through issuing more equity because Their earnings per share may decrease and at the same time debt is always better option to finance.
Answer: D. The company reissues the treasury stock it holds.
Explanation:
Earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Net Income by the weighted average number of shares that a company has outstanding. If the company reissues treasury stock, this would increase the number of average stock outstanding thereby increasing the denominator of the EPS equation which would have the effect of reducing the Earnings per share.
For instance, if a company had net income of $50 and common equity outstanding of $40, the EPS would be;
= 50/40
= $1.25
If the company reissues treasury stock of $30, the EPS would change to;
= 50/ (40 +30)
= $0.71
Explanation:
This is a complex issue that may reflect on the organizational culture of that company. As a leader, it is necessary to understand the situation and listen to both parties in order to find a favorable solution for the company and the employees. Since Marshall's work is important to the company, firing him at first may not be a favorable decision, what the leader can do is provide feedback to him about his interpersonal relationship at the company.
As an effective leader, it is necessary to constantly monitor the work and the relationship between employees, in which case it is necessary to understand the reason for Marshall's behavior and try to change the parameters and procedures that may be facilitating this behavior. It is necessary for him to understand that despite being an effective worker, the company is an integrated system that must be in perfect synchronicity for it to be successful in the market.
What the leader could do in this case then is to try to change the code of organizational ethics, seek training and psychological assistance for Marshall if necessary, talk to the workers who are part of the conflict to understand the situation in the best way, to seek a work redesign. , etc.
Answer:
$418,550
Explanation:
Steps are shown below:
a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
= 
= 
= 2,040 units
b. The number of orders would be equal to
= Annual demand ÷ economic order quantity
= $52,000 ÷ 2,040 units
= 25.49 orders
c. The average inventory would equal to
= Economic order quantity ÷ 2
= 2040 units ÷ 2
= 1,020 units
d. The total cost of ordering cost and carrying cost equals to
Ordering cost = Number of orders × ordering cost per order
= 25.49 orders × $50
= $1,275
Carrying cost = average inventory × carrying cost per unit
= 1,020 units × $1.25
= $1,275
So, the total annual cost would be
= Purchase cost + ordering cost + carrying cost
= $416,000 + $1,275 + $1,275
= $418,550
Purchase cost = Annual demand × cost per unit
= 52,000 × $8
= $416,000
