Answer: Because Sweet Nothings is an expository piece of writing.
Explanation:
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings presents evidence to support weight loss and refute weight loss because her writing is an expository piece of writing.
An expository piece of writing just as the name implies is one that exposes readers to a particular idea or topic. It’s purpose is to inform about and describe a particular subject or idea.
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings may have been expected to stick to a particular side of the subject, that is either present evidence that supports weight loss or the one that refutes weight loss.
Instead, she presented both because her writing is an expository piece informing her readers about the both the advantages and disadvantages of weight loss.
The most accurate answer for this would most likely be answer choice A.
Not only does that answer have words directly from the excerpt to support it, but the cottage is described as being a pleasant and homey space that everyone can gather in. With the words “lived in,” it shows that the cottage is happy and lively.
I hope this helps! :)
<h2><em>€</em><em>€</em><em>A</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em></h2>
This famous saying from John Lennon reflects a paradox in our lives. Many of us would like to have a peaceful ride, enjoy the present moment, yet we can't help but make future plans so we feel secure, or we spend time digging on past hurts. ... To stay on the path we must trust, live in the present, and let go of f`e`a`r.
Explanation:
comment if wrong
(*ˊᗜˋ*)ᵗᑋᵃᐢᵏ ᵞᵒᵘ
good day
#J.r
They are protest poems because the poet used the poems to express beliefs a bout wars and about the government that led her to wars. They are full of ideological beliefs and are kind of persuasive so they are often considered to be protest poems. and 2 hopefully thats right I wish you luck. I got the answer from the S.E. Asia Theme of War flashcards quizlet by tytianna20 if you need it. :)
Ashley couldn’t hear her mother
