Answer:
Early tasks opposed to later tasks.
Explanation:
Shortening is a strategic procedure used by project managers to reduce or shorten a project's duration by cutting the duration of critical path tasks.
The rationale behind shortening of a project is basically to have a competitive advantage or edge in the market. In order to compete successfully, project managers are always expected to be spontaneous in bringing their company's goods and services to the market in a flash.
There are two important ways of shortening a particular project, these are;
1. Crashing.
2. Task splitting.
In project management, the longest task is considered to be the most effective and efficient candidate activities to shorten a project's duration.
In general, the better candidates for shortening are early tasks opposed to later tasks. The early start of tasks represents one of the primary date used in project scheduling and it's the earliest date a project manager commences an activity, with respect to all its predecessors and successors.
Early tasks usually involves the use of an easy approach to project kickoff while later tasks uses the difficult approach.
The marginal revenue curve of an oligopolist begins to decline after 500 units of output. Which type of oligopoly does Sweezy's company most likely operate under?
A market system known as an oligopoly occurs when a small number of important sellers or manufacturers dominate a market or an industry (from the Greek words oligos, "few," and v, polein, "to sell"). The result of corporate cooperation to boost profits is typically oligopoly. Numerous industries have been identified as being oligopolistic, including commercial aviation, power providers, telecommunications companies, rail freight markets, food processing, funeral services, sugar refining, beer production, pulp and paper manufacture, and auto manufacturing. Because of the decreased competition, consumer prices would increase and labour earnings will decrease.
Learn More About oligopoly:
brainly.com/question/14285126
#SPJ4
Answer: Differentiation focus
Explanation:
Marketing focus is not an actual marketing term. Cost leadership strategy's main focus is on the reduction of expenses which in turn, lowers prices of product while targeting a wide array of market segments.
In this question, Volkswagen is not reducing costs, or targeting large market segments. Differentiation strategy” require products to possess significant points of difference in brand image, product offerings, higher quality, advanced technology, and superior service to command a higher price while also targeting a wide array of market segments. For this question, these factors are not explaineded as targeting a broad market segments.
Differentiation focus strategy requires the products to have significant points of difference that is vital to target one or only a few market segments. For this question, Volkswagen uses a specific and unique factor to appeal to a specific group of people. So differentiation focus is the answer.
Answer:
The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.
Explanation:
<u>For First stock </u>
Total dividend from first stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.32 * 2 = $0.64
HPR of first stock = (Total dividend from first stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($0.64 + ($31.72 - $27.85)) / $27.85 = 0.1619, or 16.19%
Annualized holding period return of first stock = HPR of first stock * Number 6 months in a year = 16.19% * 2 = 32.38%
<u>For Second stock </u>
Total dividend from second stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.67 * 4 = $2.68
Since you expect to sell the stock in one year, we have:
Annualized holding period return of second stock = The 1-year HPR for the second stock = (Total dividend from second stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($2.68+ ($36.79 - $34.98)) / $34.98 = 0.1284, or 12.84%
Since the Annualized holding period return of first stock of 32.38% is higher than the Annualized holding period return of second stock of 12.84%. the first stock will provide the better annualized holding period return.
The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.
