1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
3 years ago
12

Which of the statements are true ?

Mathematics
1 answer:
anzhelika [568]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B and C hope its corect


You might be interested in
Write the equation of this line in point-slope form using the point (1,-3) .
Nookie1986 [14]

Answer:

c. y + 3 = (1/2)(x - 1)

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL GIVE BRAINLEST. How do I do this my notes aren’t making sense
kifflom [539]

Answer:

m\angle x=80^o

Step-by-step explanation:

<u><em>The question is</em></u>

Find the measure of angle x

we know that

In this problem

m\angle x=80^o ----> by alternate interior angles

Because, each pair of these angles are inside the parallel lines, and on opposite sides of the transversal.

5 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
How do you find area and perimeter of a rectangle with the side lengths of 5x^2 and 12x?
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

The area can be found by multiplying the two terms, and the perimeter by doubling and adding them.

Using this, we find that the area of the rectangle is 60x³, and the perimeter is 10x² + 24x.

Step-by-step explanation:

First let's find the area:

5x² × 12x

= 60x³

Now the perimeter:

2(5x² + 12x)

= 10x² + 24x

8 0
3 years ago
Once again assistance is needed. Help!!!!
tatiyna

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Punkt p (1;2k+1) należy do wykresu funkcji f(x)=-4x2+7. Oblicz k
    7·1 answer
  • Best trucking company for biginers
    9·2 answers
  • Answer The Expression. 55−63+20 1/4 ÷ 43 1/4
    15·1 answer
  • 5x + 2 – 2 = -18 – 2 5x = -20 true or false
    14·2 answers
  • Find the 50ty term if the nth term is 5n-3
    9·1 answer
  • 12
    10·1 answer
  • Please answer ASAP! Plz I’m begging I really need this correct or my mum will be very very mad
    13·1 answer
  • What is 8.023 in expanded form
    15·2 answers
  • Help will give points
    10·1 answer
  • Given:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!