Answer:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: ∪ = No possible child abuse or neglect
Alternative hypothesis: Uₐ = Possible child abuse or neglect
A type I error occurs when you reject the null hypothesis when it is true. In this situation, a type I error occurs when you conclude on possible child neglect or abuse and place the child in protective custody
A type II error occurs when you accept the null hypothesis when it is false. In this instance, a type II error occurs when you conclude on no possible child abuse or neglect when there is and fail to remove the child from the home.
In this case, the type II error is the more serious error. Failure to remove the child when there is possible child abuse or neglect will lead to more detrimental effect. Although, the type I error is also serious, it is not so detrimental as the type II error.
Answer:
Neighborhood Q appears to have a bigger family size
Step-by-step explanation:
Mean = the sum of all data values divided by the total number of data values
Number of families in Neighborhood Q = 9
Mean family size of Neighborhood Q:
= (2 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 5 + 3 + 6 + 5) ÷ 9
= 35 ÷ 9
= 3.888888...
Number of families in Neighborhood S = 9
Mean family size of Neighborhood S:
= (2 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 7 + 2 + 3 + 3 + 2) ÷ 9
= 27 ÷ 9
= 3
The mean family size of Neighborhood Q is 3.88.. and the mean family size of Neighborhood S is 3. Therefore, Neighborhood Q appears to have a bigger family size as it's average family size is bigger than that of Neighborhood S.
4x is the proportionality
60% is 0.60 so you do 0.60 x 29 which = to 17.4
so your answer is 17.40 or 17.4 is 60% of 29
