1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kazeer [188]
4 years ago
11

Explain the relationship between poor soil and deforestation in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Social Studies
1 answer:
amm18124 years ago
7 0

<u>Relationship between poor soil and deforestation in Sub-Saharan Africa:</u>

Due to deforestation, the nutrients in soil will be drained specially if the land is used for farming. If there is no practices of farming, the soil will be blown away due to wind which leave with barren land like desertification. After the soil erosion, during deforestation the soil becomes poor and unprotected.

As the deforestation concept is very clear of cutting down trees in forest and rain-forest . Most often deforestation takes place due to commercial purposes for constructing building for the habitat of people which leads to the extinction of animals and plants.

You might be interested in
Three-year-old sam gets a lot of satisfaction out of scolding gill, his pretend friend and imaginary playmate. sam is in piaget'
Svetllana [295]
Sam is in Piaget's preoperational stage of cognitive development. In addition, the preoperational stage is the second stage in Piaget's theory of cognitive development in which this stage starts around age 2 as children start to talk and last until approximately age 7. Throughout this stage, the children begin to take part in a symbolic play and learn to use symbols.
5 0
3 years ago
You have just been elected to the head a new Child Welfare organization. Your first mission is to solve the problem of child pov
cricket20 [7]

Answer:

1- The proposal would be to improve education in Brazil through full-time school education, where children and teenagers could have different classes and courses, such as courses in foreign languages ​​and professional training, with monetary incentives for children who got good grades.

2- The main challenges foreseen for the inclusion of the integral school in Brazil could be population adhesion, lack of funds and legislative bureaucracy. Such challenges could culminate in school dropouts, lack of resources to hire new professionals, school structure and materials, in addition to a long delay in the approval of the educational change project.

3- The difficulty of solving social problems in any society is a complex task because such problems occur for structural reasons that would impact the way that society organizes itself politically, socially and culturally. There are also institutional problems such as political corruption that makes it difficult to develop a fairer and more egalitarian society for the entire population.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following contributed to the mass conversion of people living in the Middle East to Islam by the eighth century?
Annette [7]

Answer:

option A

Explanation:

The correct answer is option A

the mass conversion of people to Islam by the eighth century offered them many financial and social benefits.

As the people start following Islam, they start supporting the cause of Quran economically and socially.

People start spreading the knowledge of Quran and increasing the conversion of people.

8 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
How did the Supreme Court case, Gibbons v. Ogden, affect interstate commerce?
kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

A: it determined that the only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • "it's so noisy! how can you stand it?" remarks caitlyn as the thruway traffic screams past her friend dave's ground floor apartm
    8·1 answer
  • How would the davis-moore thesis explain the fact that physicians earn far more money than bus drivers?
    5·1 answer
  • Which constitutional amendment guaranteed the right to vote for all Americans 18 years of age or older?
    7·1 answer
  • During the early history of the Persian Empire, Cyrus the Great conquered the area known as Mesopotamia. This region made up the
    10·1 answer
  • Which landforms do you think are best for farming in North America?why?
    9·1 answer
  • List the three groups of people not mentioned in the Declaration of Independence
    14·1 answer
  • ​Researchers assessed the personalities of the children who were adopted at an early age by Julene and Jay. The researchers comp
    10·1 answer
  • Give two examples of conditions that are common in each type of economy.
    15·1 answer
  • What happened at the democratic convention please help
    6·1 answer
  • To help paint an accurate mural at school, a student should use a
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!