1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scorpion4ik [409]
3 years ago
14

You are a self-employed profit-maximizing consultant specializing in monoplies. Five single-price, profit-maximizing monopolies

are currently seeking your advice, and although the information they have supplied to you is incomplete, your expert knowledge allows you to go back and make a definite recommendation in each case. Select one of the following recommendations for each firm in the short run:_________
a. remain at the current output level
b. increase output
c. reduce output
d. shut down
e. go back and recalculate your figures because the ones supplied can't possibly be right
Business
1 answer:
inna [77]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<u>Firm A  </u>

Firm A is charging a cost of $3.90 for every unit. The normal expense is the all out cost separated by amount which ends up being $3.70 per unit. Presently its minor income is $3.00 per unit and negligible expense is $2.90 per unit. The imposing business model firm can't create enough yield in light of the fact that the minor income surpasses the minimal expense.  

Consequently, Firm A is encouraged to expand its yield. This will bring increasingly net income and get it a higher benefit. The yield should increment till minimal income and negligible expense gets equivalent.  

<u>Firm B  </u>

Firm B is charging a cost of $5.90 for every unit. The normal expense is $4.74 per unit. Presently its peripheral expense is $5.90 per unit. Note that the syndication firm is charging a value which is equivalent to the negligible expense. Consequently, it is carrying on seriously. by delivering more and charging less.  

Consequently, Firm An is encouraged to diminish its yield. This will expand cost more than the expansion in cost with the goal that it acquires a higher benefit. The yield should diminish till minimal income and minor expense gets equivalent.  

<u>Firm C  </u>

Firm C is charging a cost of $11.00 for every unit. The normal expense is the all out expense is $11.90 per unit. Minimal income is $9.00 per unit and minor expense is $9.00 per unit. The imposing business model firm is delivering a benefit expanding yield on the grounds that the minor income rises to the peripheral expense. Nonetheless, it is bearing misfortunes since normal expense is higher than cost.  

Thus, Firm C is encouraged to stay at the present degree of yield. It can close down over the long haul if misfortunes keep on happening. This is on the grounds that it can't increment or diminishing its yield as it will just alumni the misfortunes.  

<u>Firm D  </u>

Firm D is charging a cost of $35.90 for every unit. The normal expense is additionally 35.90 per unit. The minor income is $37.90 per unit and negligible expense is $37.90 per unit. The imposing business model firm is creating a benefit amplifying yield on the grounds that the minor income approaches the peripheral expense. Strangely, its cost is not as much as its negligible income which is beyond the realm of imagination.  

Thus, Firm D has fouled up estimations with respect to its cost. Thoughtfully, the cost ought to consistently be higher than the minimal income or at most extreme it tends to be equivalent to minor income. It ought to return and recalculate the cost.  

<u>Firm E  </u>

The information identified with the minor income and minimal expense for Firm E isn't given. The cost charged is $35.00 per unit. The normal expense is at its base level and is equivalent to $33.00 per unit. This data isn't adequate to distinguish if the firm is working at a benefit boosting level.  

Therefore, Firm E is encouraged to stay at the present degree of yield.

You might be interested in
Short-term price reductions that can be used to retaliate against a competitor's actions like introducing a new product are call
vlada-n [284]

Short-term price reductions that can be used to retaliate against a competitor's actions like introducing a new product are called deals.

Instead of considering an asset's long-term fundamentals, short-term trading mostly concentrates on price action. This trading strategy looks for market volatility around significant economic data releases, corporate earnings, and political events in an effort to profit from sudden changes in market prices.

A mutual agreement or communication between two or more parties that intend to conduct business is referred to as a business deal. The transaction is typically carried out between a seller and a buyer to exchange valuable assets including money, products, services, and information.

Learn more about Short-term price here  brainly.com/question/16968866

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
A.
borishaifa [10]

internet service providers

3 0
2 years ago
Ralph has worked as a model builder at Snowdrop Architects for 30 years. He gets laid off, and the firm then hires Charlotte, wh
Sliva [168]

Answer: Ralph does not have a good claim against Snowdrop, because age was not the deciding factor in Snowdrop’s decision to lay off Ralph.

Explanation: The reason for the firm laying off Ralph is vague and not explicitly stated. Therefore Ralph cannot make a claim against Snowdrop for laying him off due to his age.

5 0
3 years ago
Halpert Hardware Pros, an American retail store, buys most of its inventory from Asian countries. Halpert Hardware Pros would be
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer: rose

Explanation: In the given case, Halpert hardware imports from asian countries,that is, they are on the buying side of the transaction. Therefore, if the value of dollar rises in relation to the currencies of countries from which halpert buys than they will be able to purchase more quantity with the same amount of dollars.

8 0
3 years ago
Fred purchases a bond, newly issued by the Big Time Corporation, for $10,000. The bond pays $400 to its holder at the end of the
VashaNatasha [74]

Answer: The correct answer is "B. $10,000; 4%; four years".

Fred purchases a bond, newly issued by the Big Time Corporation, for $10,000. The bond pays $400 to its holder at the end of the first, second, and third years and pays $10,400 upon its maturity at the end of four years. The principal amount of this bond is <u>$10000,</u> the coupon rate is <u>4%,</u> and the term of this bond is <u>four years.</u>

<u></u>

Explanation: The maturity of the bond is at 4 years.

Its future value or face value is 10000.

The coupon rate is equal to \frac{Cupon}{Face value} x 100

So Coupon rate = \frac{400}{10000} x 100 = 4%

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the disadvantages of choosing the lease? Check all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • Darwin Company, a manufacturer, has provided the following information pertaining to its recent year of operation: • Net income
    7·1 answer
  • Interest income received by a cash basis taxpayer is generally reported in the tax year it is received. True False
    12·1 answer
  • In recent years, foreign firms were reluctant to merge with or acquire American corporations.a. Trueb. False
    9·1 answer
  • 3. What is the key difference between Net Pay and Gross Pay?
    10·1 answer
  • Expansionary fiscal policy relies on changes in tax collections and government spending to achieve a non inflationary level of e
    8·1 answer
  • Coronado Industries had the following accounts and balances:
    15·2 answers
  • Suppose a​ student-athlete has the opportunity to earn ​$600,000 next year playing for a minor league baseball​ team, ​$100,000
    6·1 answer
  • Employer-sponsored retirement plans requiring a minimum length of time of service to participate are.
    13·1 answer
  • James was transferred by his company to go work in Hong Kong for six months. His headquarters in Dallas, Texas, assured him that
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!