Answer:
Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do.
Explanation:
Lamarck and Darwin both were scientists who tried to understand the concepts of evolution. Lamarck's theory of evolution was based upon how living organisms vary during their lifetime, and after that they pass these changes to their offspring. While on the other hand Darwin's theory was very much based upon evidences and practical explanation that is why his theory became accepted and Lamarck's wasn't.
A sequence of biotic changes that regenerate or create an ecological community is known as ecological succession.
Ecological succession is the process of change in an ecological community's species composition over time. The time frame can span several decades or fewer (for instance, following a wildfire). The community grows through an increase in complexity from a small number of pioneering plants and animals to a stable or self-sustaining climax community.
Succession is a process that occurs after a disturbance or the early colonization of a new environment. It involves changes to an ecological community that are more or less predictable and orderly. Secondary succession refers to succession that occurs after a pre-existing community has been disrupted, whereas primary succession refers to succession that starts in new environments with no impact from pre-existing groups.
To know more about ecological succession, refer to the following link:
brainly.com/question/10167897
#SPJ4
<span>The correct answer is Energy is lost as heat in each stage, causing the amount of energy available to decrease with each stage. This means that eventually energy is bound to run out. Simplest example is a car for example, as long as it works there's less and less fuel, and eventually the energy runs out, or in this case the fuel.</span>
