Answer:
Option D. The accountant was a member of a professional organization.
Explanation:
The reason is that for a successful claim under the negligence act, the claimant have to prove following three things:
- Duty of care existed between the relation
- She has suffered economic harm &
- The harm was proximately caused by the accountant's breach of the duty of care.
So the accountant's membership is not a valid requirement under the negligence act for a successful claim.
This is an example of insider trading, which is using private company data or information to make improper gains.
Answer:
Confirmation of accounts receivables is not required when the account information is immaterial.
An account is said to have immaterial information when the account doesn't reflect any important or relevant information that can affect the opinions or decisions of shareholders, potential investors or creditors of the company.
The auditors have the responsibility of deciding what information is relevant and important and what is immaterial
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, the Solomon and Flores form of trust exist in business if bluffing is an accepted rule of business negotiation because bluffing is acceptable in the business. If bluffing is an accepted rule of business negotiation then there is no trust formed between Solomon and Flores and the reason for this is that bluffing is a bad act which makes relationship worse between the partners but in this case trust exist in business due to the rule of bluffing.
Answer: Option C
Explanation:
A. Bonds can be called at discount or premium depending upon the interest rate availing in market and the coupon interest rate.
B. In case of bearer bonds no transactions and ownership records are maintained.
C. Indenture is the contract between issuer and holder specifying the duties and obligations of issuer and the rights of holders.
D. Collateralized bonds are backed by a pool of assets while debentures are unsecured bonds .
E. A bondholder can have the right to determine it only when he have the put option with him otherwise the right to call bond lies with the issuer.
