Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
The last time I experienced ineffective communication was when I tried talking to my younger sibling on the dangers of anger. I had noticed that she always threw tantrums and would always get angry when she did not get her way.
1. The communication was ineffective because I used bogus words which she found difficult to understand. In a statement I made, I mentioned that 'anger was inimical and detrimental as it predisposes a person to health issues which could lead to death'. This sentence was ineffective as she did not understand the meaning of inimical and detrimental and the possibility of death scared her.
2. The encoding and decoding stages were problematic. The encoding stage was problematic because I did not really understand the level of knowledge of my receiver. The decoding stage was also problematic because the receiver was lost as to the meaning of the words I used and misinterpreted the message.
3. Filtering is the withholding of information by a sender because he feels the receiver might not need the information. I filtered the meaning of the big words I used which were not age-appropriate.
4. I should have used words that would be understood by a five-year-old. This means that instead of using inimical and detrimental, I would have used bad or not good. Death was also not a good example to have used. I would have said that anger would make us not to be loved by our friends or any other lighter example.
Answer:
The correct answer is : False
Explanation:
It is false because the participants would be able to evaluate each other’s assertions. They would be motivated by the desire of getting a rational consensus. The doctrine is based on the fact that everyone can question any assertion. It also says that every person with the ability to speak and act is permitted to be and take part in a discourse.
Answer:
The action that you must take would be to turn your vessel around to avoid the risk of collision.
Explanation:
<span>False
because there is no limit on how much a Political Action Committee (PAC) may
contribute directly to a campaign. PAC is the political organization
established by a corporation, labor union, or other special-interest group
designed to support candidates by contributing money. There are </span>problems associated with campaign finance laws in
Texas which are mentioned below:
<span>1. </span>Texas laws regulating campaign contributions and
spending are difficult to interpret and enforce.
<span>2. </span>Investigations by the Travis County district
attorney's office - not the Texas Ethics Commission
<span>3. </span>Led to grand jury hearings and charges against
contributors and political operatives
<span>4. </span>Even though the Texas law specified criminal and
civil penalties for violators, it provided no means for enforcement.
<span>5. </span>Reporting of campaign contributions was uneven -
and unverified
<span>6. </span>Ethics law did not impose limits on campaign
contributions.
If you were giving a persuasive speech on gun control to members of the National Rifle Association, the most important factor to consider in audience analysis would probably be the: <span>group membership of your audience
Gun users typically came from these backgrounds:
- Those who wanted to use it for recreational purposes, such as hunting or on shooting range
- Or those who use it for personal safety.
When writing persuasive speech , try to specify it based on your audiences</span>
