The awnser is obviously c just read it (no harsh ferlings)
Answer:
The correct answer is 2) Adolf Hitler brazenly disobeyed the Treaty of Versailles. 4) The Great Depression fueled political unrest in some nations. And 5) An embargo by the U.S. against Japan cut off its oil supply.
Explanation:
After the first war, this had several effects which caused the impact of the second world war, the great depression in many countries worldwide had never experienced such a situation of misery and insecurity, insecurity was part of the effect of not having economic resources, and Everyone was looking to survive.
Also, another starting point was that Hitler would secretly start his troops and enlist them to invade different countries and take control of Germany, completely ignoring the Versailles treaty, which they had previously signed.
As Germany supported Japan, it was seen reinforced to attack the United States by the blockade that had made of its assets in the country, which reduced its oil exports leaving it without enough for war, so Japan with the help of its allies decides to attack the United States Causing the United States and its partners to intervene more directly in the fight until defeating Germany and all its allies, including Japan.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
Sargon the Great
He then went on to conquer all of the Sumerian city-states and united northern and southern Mesopotamia under a single ruler.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Can legislative compromises solve moral issues?
It is an interesting question that cannot be answered with a simple "yes" or "no." That is the nature of moral and ethical issues.
Legislative compromises serve to dictate laws that must be enforced. But you cannot enforce a moral issue. That is why it is moral.
Legislators must serve the citizens who voted for them. Not to the interests of political action committees (PACs) or private interests of corporations. Legislators serve the American people, not to a lobbyist that negotiates on the personal agendas of the people who are rich.
That is the moral issue. The way a legislator is going to act when facing the pressure of particular political agendas that are the opposite of the interests of the US citizens.
