it got him a step further ahead
Hello there!
Question #1
<span>What was established in the case of Miranda v. Arizona?
One aspect that they truly convened was the fifth amendment which were to require laws that conveyed certain things that would have to be considered and handled properly.
Question #2
</span><span>How does this affect the legal process?
This would affect is because before this, it was quite easier to acquire certain laws, and to easily dishonor them. But ever sense this came about, it was more serious.
Question #3
</span><span> In the case of U.S. v. Nixon, what did the court ultimately decide about the president with regard to rule of law?
They decided that the president does not inform or enforce the final decision. It would have to go into a process,and not a pure law straight abound.
I hope this helps you!</span>
Answer:
C. is the correct answer.
Explanation:
According to the Declaration of Independence, when the government abuses its power, the people should change it or even overthrow it. As the Declaration says, “it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.” ... People have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The Declaration of Independence says that we not only have the right but we also have the duty to alter or abolish any government that does not secure our unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
