In order to provide a piece of evidence to compare the level of the Incas’ and Maya culture’s investments in public works projects, you can mention the following:
As regards Incas' architecture: Qollqa were stone houses situated on hillsides. They had drainage canals in order to keep the interior dry. Another example can be Machu Picchu that was a settlement like a fortress (located in the High Andes of Perú)
As regards Mayas' architecture: its region consisted of the northern lowlands, their pyramids relied on intricately carved stone. They built temples like 'The Temple of the Cross at Palenque. Usually, their structures were covered with stucco to smooth imperfections. Besides, their structures were aligned so as to have an astronomical observation.
Answer:
Germany...................?????
Answer:
Roosevelt, with his “big stick” policy, was able to keep the United States out of military conflicts by employing the legitimate threat of force. Nonetheless, as negotiations with Japan illustrated, the maintenance of an empire was fraught with complexity.
I don't know what you're referring to, and don't think it was much different than defending against a number of well-armed, trained, and disciplined troops. If anything, the German Army in WWII was a really tough bunch.
<span>Two things may show some differences, however, at least in the war in the Pacific. Japanese were far more willing to fight to the last man, rather than surrender, whereas most German units would stick the white flag up when it was clear that they had lost the engagement, and had no retreat. In "island hopping", the US also took on extremely fortified Japanese positions that were not destroyed with even massive bombing and naval fire</span>
He believed in democracy and a government ruled by the people. Even though this was his greatest moment, he didn't want to make himself a king
