1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
finlep [7]
4 years ago
15

Sheila bought some rose plants and sunflower plants.There were 35 rose plants than sunflower plants.If the ratio of the rose pla

nts to sunflower plants was 8:3,how many of each variety did she buy?
Answer this
Mathematics
1 answer:
DENIUS [597]4 years ago
6 0
So assuming that youmeans there were 35 MORE rose plants than sunflower seeds, then

Rose:Sunflower =8:3

rose=sunflower+35
therefor

8 units=rose
3 units=sunflowers

rose-35=sunflower
8unit-35=3unit
5unit-35=0
5unit=35
therefor
35=5unit
divide by 5
7=1unit


so 8 units of roses

7 times 8=56

3 units of sunflowers
3 times 7=21

rose=56
sunflower=21
You might be interested in
The variance of a stock's returns can be calculated as the:
Tamiku [17]

Answer:

The correct option is b.

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for standard deviation is

\sigma^2=\frac{\sum {(x-\overline{x})^2}}{n}

where, \overline{x} is mean of the data and n is number of observation.

The variance of a stock's returns can be calculated by the above formula.

Variance of stock's returns is the average value of squared deviations from the mean.

Therefore the correct option is b.

4 0
4 years ago
Find the value of x. If necessary, you may learn with the markings on a figure indicate.
love history [14]

Answer:

112

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The formula an=a1+(n−1)⋅d is used for a geometric explicit formula. <br><br> true<br> false
Ulleksa [173]
True i hope it helps
3 0
3 years ago
On August 19, 2002, the ratio of stocks gaining value on the New York Stock
pickupchik [31]

Answer:

D: 1868

Step-by-step explanation:

43:20 ratio

43/20 = 2.15

869 * 2.15 = 1,868.35

round down to nearest whole number

1,868

5 0
3 years ago
a baseball diamond is square with side 90 ft. A batter hits the ball and runs toward first base with a speed of 24ft / s. at wha
julia-pushkina [17]

When I see "at what rate", I know this question must come from
pre-Calculus, so I won't feel bad using a little Calculus to solve it.

-- The runner, first-base, and second-base form a right triangle.
    The right angle is at first-base.

-- One leg of the triangle is the line from first- to second-base.
   It's 90-ft long, and it doesn't change.

-- The other leg of the triangle is the line from the runner to first-base.
    Its length is  90-24T.  ('T' is the seconds since the runner left home plate.)

-- The hypotenuse of the right triangle is

         square root of [ 90² + (90-24T)² ] =

         square root of [ 8100 + 8100 - 4320T + 576 T² ] =

         square root of [ 576 T² - 4320 T + 16,200 ]

We want to know how fast this distance is changing
when the runner is half-way to first base.

Before we figure out when that will be, we know that since
the question is asking about how fast this quantity is changing,
sooner or later we're going to need its derivative.  Let's bite the
bullet and do that now, so we won't have to worry about it.    

       Derivative of  [ 576 T² - 4320 T + 16,200 ] ^ 1/2 =

 (1/2) [ 576 T² - 4320 T + 16,200 ] ^ -1/2 times (576T - 4320) .

There it is.  Ugly but manageable.

How fast is this quantity changing when the runner is halfway to first-base ?
Well, we need to know when that is ... how many seconds after he leaves
the plate.

Total time it takes him to reach first-base = (90 ft)/(24 ft/sec) = 3.75 sec .
He's halfway there when   T = (3.75 / 2) = 1.875 seconds.  (Seems fast.)

Now all we have to do is plug in 1.875 wherever we see 'T' in the big derivative,
and we'll know the rate at which that hypotenuse is changing at that time.
Here goes.  Take a deep breath:

(1/2) [ 576 T² - 4320 T + 16,200 ] ^ -1/2 times (576T - 4320)  = 

[ 576 T² - 4320 T + 16,200 ] ^ -1/2 times (1152T - 8640)  = 

[576(1.875)² - 4320(1.875) + 16,200]^-1/2 times [1152(1.875)-8640] =

[    2,025      -  8,100  +  16,200 ] ^ -1/2  times   [ 2,160 - 8640 ]  = 

- 6480 / √10,125  =   - 64.4 ft/sec. 


I have a strong hunch that this answer is absurd, but I'm not going to waste
any more time on it, (especially not for 5 points, if you'll forgive me). 
I've outlined a method of analysis and an approach to the solution, and
I believe both of them are reasonable.  I'm sure you can take it from there,
and I hope you have better luck with your arithmetic than I've had with mine. 

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do I solve this?
    12·1 answer
  • Geometry math question no Guessing and Please show work
    8·2 answers
  • Find how many ways can we find three students out of ten students​
    14·1 answer
  • A player shoots a basketball from a height of 6 feet. The equation, h = -16t 2 + 25t + 6, gives the height, h , of the basketbal
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone help me please thanks.
    10·2 answers
  • I need help plz i’ll mark u as brainliest
    14·1 answer
  • Marc and Anthony are pulling weeds. The can pull 25 weeds every three minutes. How many weeds can they pull in 15 minutes?
    10·2 answers
  • you made a 12 minute call using a calling card. The call costs $0.66. there is a $1.21 left on your card. if the rate stays the
    15·1 answer
  • 12x^2 + ax -20<br> if 3x + 4 is a factor of the expression above, what is the value of a?
    6·2 answers
  • Simplify -x(4x^2 − 6x + 1)
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!