Answer: Not necessarily: The debt ratios are not directly comparable, since each company is in a different industry.
Explanation:
We cannot authoritatively state that even though Boeing has such a high debt rate, that it is a riskier company than either Microsoft or PG&E. This is due to the drawback in ratio analysis of bias if compared across different industries.
Ratio analysis best works when comparing companies in the same industry because their situations will be similar. Comparing across industries can be misleading because different industries operate in different ways. In the Airplane manufacturing business for instance, having a high amount of debt due to having the tangible assets to back it up might be a normal thing.
The debt ratios are therefore not directly comparable because each company is in a different industry.
That would be the galaxy called MACS0647-JD, Its a long name but If the distance estimate is correct, it formed about 427 million years after the Big Bang. Hope this helps!
Explanation:
hope I'll help you mark me as brainliest
<span>0.75
The midpoint method is to calculate the percentage as the change in value divided by the average (or midpoint) of the new and old values. So the price of the sandwich changed from $5 to $7. Using the midpoint formula, you get
(7-5)/((7+5)/2) = 2/(12/2) = 2/6 = 0.3333 = +33.3%
The change in sandwiches due to the change in price is
(90-70)/((90+70)/2) = 20/(160/2) = 20/80 = 0.25 = +25%
The elasticity of supply will be the percentage change in demand divided by the percentage change in price. So
25/33.3 = 0.75
So the coefficient of elasticity is 0.75</span>