Answer:
"the pessimists underestimate our decision-making accuracy because of factors such as choosing questions that contradict people's schemas"
Explanation:
Thaler is together with Daniel Khaneman one of the parents of behavioral economics. This branch focuses on explaining and even looking for meaning in our economic behavior. In other words, why we make the decisions we make regarding our money.
In many social sciences, two different points of view about our rationality coexist today: the pessimist, who sees our limitations as systematic errors at the root of our possible irrational behavior; and the optimist, who conceives these limits as ecological advantages. The first point of view, the pessimist, is maintained by Tversky and Kahneman in their research program on heuristics and biases, and is also based on the theory of "little shoves" or nudges, which Thaler and Sunstein propose following that approach of Tversky and Kahneman.
The second, the optimist, has been developed by Gerd Gigerenzer and the Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition (ABC) at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, and by other evolutionary psychologists such as Leda Cosmides and John Tooby.
Answer: She is displaying normal lack of impulse control
Explanation: Generally, impulse control disorder is the inability to resist an impulse, that is, a temptation, an urge, or some thought, where impulsive reactions may interfere with or otherwise injure others. Such persons have a problem controlling their emotions and behaviour.
In this case, it is a child of three years, which means that there is a case of normal lack of impulse control. In other words, such children are driven by impulses, such children experience an impulse as something that should be expressed immediately without paying attention to rules or restrictions, for them it's natural. And this can be called some kind of disorder, but more like a problem with attention deficit, where the basic problem is that such children accept that they should first stop and think about the thought that came to their mind before reacting, because usually such children they respond immediately.
Some things the Romans did for fun were horrible. They enjoyed fights between gladiators, and fights between people and animals. These bloodthirsty shows were put on in front of crowds in large arenas called amphitheatres. Roman emperors paid for free shows at theatres and amphitheatres.
Answer:
Dostoevsky style in film; “American Idol” winners.
Explanation:
This is False. States prefer Block Grants.