The society's members. This is because the perspective of the functionalist lies mostly on the social consensus among the members of the society. With this, functionalists believe that the people are the ones who make the society through their own acts of making the society prosper.
There are many examples of genocides in history which are done on similar lines of protecting the race like the Armenian Genocide.
Explanation:
The Armenian people are a persecuted minority in Eastern Europe before World War 1 and started facing undue hate crimes during the war due to many reasons.
The ottoman expire ad an irrational hatred for them and oftentimes would put the Armenians in jails or get killed.
During the war, the rhetoric was to blame the Armenians for the precarious state of the empire.
In reality the empire was weak and losing the war and wanted an excuse to show that they are not losing because of their incompetence.
Karam, who lives in India.
Indian culture completely prohibits cohabiting before marriage and whoever does it is frowned upon by the society. In Sweden, almost everybody cohabits before marriage. the USA society is multifaceted.
Answer:
The correct answer is - conflict is resolved the differences are also resolved.
Explanation:
Cordial conflicts are the conflicts that occur inside an institution because of a lack of coordination among the staff members and students or the team members and it will reduce the amount of trust and loyalty among the members or students.
To reduce cordial conflicts is to establish trust and resolve the problems by dialogue among the members of the institution. It can be easily solved by developing a convincing and trustworthy relationship among the people by improving the terms of a good relationship.
Resolved conflict can also solve the problems within an institution and so it was a change in the previously hostile environment. Conflict results in people become angry tensed environment, but once this conflict is resolved the differences end and the environment becomes "normal" again.
Answer:
Promissory estoppel
Explanation:
If an oral contract has been declared unenforceable under the statute of frauds, yet one of the parties has rendered some performance under the contract that conferred benefits on the other party, he or she can recover the reasonable value of the performance in <u>promissory estoppel</u>.
The statute of fraud requires that contracts exceeding $500 in value, or involves the sale of landed property or extending a period of a year or more in length must be in writing and not oral. However, in a situation whereby a party has rendered some performance in the contract that confers benefits on the other party, the other party is obligated to also perform his/her part of the contract under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. The doctrine of promissory estoppel insist that an individual or party to a contract must perform his/her obligation or promise, even though there is not written proof of a contract as far as the other party has rendered some form of performance.
