1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetach [21]
3 years ago
7

Lincoln's "10 Percent Plan" dealt with

History
2 answers:
inysia [295]3 years ago
8 0
It was a proposal that would reinstate the Southern states. This plan for Reconstruction ordered that a state could be reintergrated back into the United States when 10% of the 1860 vote from that state had taken an oath of loyalty to the United States to obey the Emancipation. 
emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Re-admitting Southern states into the Union (ratify 13th amendment, reject secession, 10% of voters from 1860 pledge allegiance to US).

You might be interested in
What result did Lincoln want to encourage with the Emancipation Proclamation?
blagie [28]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

D)slaves being free to join the Union army WAS THE RESULT

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Wat three things brought about the fall of Rome when they all hit at once.
Nitella [24]

civil wars and lots of invasion

7 0
2 years ago
What role did religious differences play in the Iranian revolution and the Iran -Iraq War?
nadya68 [22]
Difference of government philosophy and differing sects of Islam. 

For the Iranian Revolution, the question of a secular versus religious government was of concern. The government being overthrown was more secular and Western influence was there. The revolutionaries were fundamentalists who wanted religion to return to the government.

In the Iraq-Iran War, it was a difference of religious sides within Islam. Iraq is more Sunni and Iran is more Shi'a. These sects have a long history of conflict and the difference in religion and politics influenced the war. Also the question of western influence in the area was of concern. 
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for historians
kaheart [24]

Answer:

There is no answers (a, b, c, d) but here we go!

Explanation:

An advantage of a primary source is that it was written by a person who experienced the event that occurred at that time, so like a soldier's journal, while a secondary source is based upon research that might not be true, and written by a person who didn't witness that event.

3 0
3 years ago
There were no women scientists during the Scientific Revolution.true or false
neonofarm [45]

Answer:false

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Anyone know this question on Washington state? Will give brainiest
    15·1 answer
  • List at least one positive and one negative effect that reconstruction had on the lives of african americans.
    13·2 answers
  • After 1880, the bulk of new immigrants to the united states came from
    10·1 answer
  • Which location never fell under Mongol control before 1259
    14·1 answer
  • Who were Crazy Horse, Geronimo, and Sitting Bull?
    12·2 answers
  • The illegal use of political influence for personal gain is called ?
    13·1 answer
  • I NEED THE RIGHT ANSWER PLEASE HELP
    7·1 answer
  • What power did the Articles of confederation give the U.S. national government?
    12·1 answer
  • The belief that a society can be perfected through the creation of model communities is known as
    6·2 answers
  • After Lenin's death in 1924, the Soviet Union was supposed to be led by a troika
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!