2 years ago

Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for historians

History

1 answer:

kaheart [24]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

There is no answers (a, b, c, d) but here we go!

Explanation:

An advantage of a primary source is that it was written by a person who experienced the event that occurred at that time, so like a soldier's journal, while a secondary source is based upon research that might not be true, and written by a person who didn't witness that event.

You might be interested in

What did the Emancipation Proclamation do for slaves in the Confederacy?

viktelen [127]

Answer: The proclamation freed the slaves

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

The original goal of the UN forces in Korea was to push North Koreans back across which parallel

Alex_Xolod [135]

The original goal was to push that North Koreans back across the 38th parallel.

6 0

2 years ago

Lincoln wanted to bring the south back into the union

Ghella [55]

Lincoln wanted to bring the south back into the union as quickly as possible, because he knew that a house divided "could not stand". He didn't want to punish the South like many other Republicans.

3 0

2 years ago

Which is Japan's most ancient religion?

avanturin [10]

Answer:

Shinto, also known as kami-no-michi, is a religion which originated in Japan.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US versus Fields the prosecution argued that feels lie was what

Ksenya-84 [330]

WE NEED CHOICES OK to work with

7 0

2 years ago