Answer:
...
Step-by-step explanation:
Gonna do a little subbing here...
for 40 pgs of express proof reading....3 bucks per pg...c = 3
40(3) - 0.05(40(3)) = T
120 - 0.05(120) = T.....120 - 6 = T.....114 = T
so express proofreading cost 114
for 40 pgs of basic proof reading....c = 3.95
40(3.95) - 0.05(40(3.95) = T
158 - 0.05(158) = T....158 - 7.9 = T.....150.10
so basic proof reading costs 150.10
for 40 pgs of extended proof reading....c = 5
40(5) - 0.05(40(5) = T
200 - 0.05(200) = T....200 - 10 = 190
so extended proof reading is 190
no need to go further....the extended proof reading is gonna be ur answer...the best quality of editing that keeps it at 190
Answer:
33.33% I am pretty sure
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
the anwser would be B but im not sure i cant see it very well
Step-by-step explanation: yep its b
By definition and according to Google:
"Irrational numbers<span> cannot be represented as terminating or repeating decimals."
So the answer to your question would have to be 'no' as calculators were designed to give us approximate answers when dealing with irrational numbers.
It would be hard to guess whether a large number produced by a calculator is irrational or not given that fact that many rational numbers can be incredibly long.
</span>
