1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
abruzzese [7]
3 years ago
7

The measure of an angle is 140°. What is the measure of its supplementary angle

Mathematics
2 answers:
Darina [25.2K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

40 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Supplementary angles are angles in which their measures combined add up to 180 degrees. So we can set up an equation:

140+x=180

x=40

So the other supplementary angle is 40 degrees

ololo11 [35]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

40 degrees

x + 140 = 180

x = 40 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
If f(x)=-2x-3 find the value f(4y)
jasenka [17]

Answer:

f(4y) = -8y - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define variables

f(x) = -2x - 3

f(4y) = x = 4y

Step 2: Plug in x = 4y

f(4y) = -2(4y) - 3

f(4y) = -8y - 3

4 0
3 years ago
Helpppp me plz i need help​
daser333 [38]

Answer:

The answer is D

Step-by-step explanation:

I learned this in school

6 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
In 2015 the viewership of a particular show was 5.6 million. A year later the viewership was 3.7 million. What was the percent o
siniylev [52]

Answer:

The percentage decrease is -33.93%

Step-by-step explanation:

Firstly we check if there is an increase or decrease

Since we went from 5.5 million to 3.7 million, that is a decrease

Percentage decrease = (3.7 - 5.6)/5.6 * 100%

= -1.9/5.6 * 100% = -33.93%

4 0
3 years ago
Factor the expression using<br>the greatest common factor:<br>27x + 45​
Ghella [55]

Answer:

The GCF should be 9

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the value of a1 in the sequence?<br><br> −4,−2,−1/2,−1/4,...
    14·2 answers
  • Zoe made 5 1/2 cups of trail mix. She wants to divide the mix into 3/4 cup servings. Ten people are going on the trip. Can Zoe m
    14·1 answer
  • What's equivalent to -2/3
    6·1 answer
  • If a company has 150 shares of common stock and $15000.00 to be distributed to its holders, how much each share receive
    15·2 answers
  • you and a friend both would like a salad and a small drink. between the two of you, you have $8.00. a salad costs $2.49 and a sm
    14·2 answers
  • Please please please I need HELP !
    15·1 answer
  • Sally bought five books.Their mean price was 3.25. The total cost for four books was 11.75.what was the cost of the fifth book​
    15·1 answer
  • Martin is throwing a little get together with his friends and goes to the corner store to buy some candy bars
    6·1 answer
  • What is -310.5 as a fraction​
    8·2 answers
  • I need help on number one please!<br> Points!!!
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!