1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kherson [118]
3 years ago
10

What impact did the Court Packing scheme have on Roosevelt’s presidency?

History
1 answer:
N76 [4]3 years ago
7 0
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was eager to implement his New Deal programs as an antidote to the Great Depression.  However, the US Supreme Court had already ruled that some provisions of the New Deal were unconstitutional, because they took too much power into the hands of the federal government, especially the executive branch of the federal government.  So, riding the momentum of his landslide reelection victory in 1936, in February of 1937, FDR proposed a plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges.  The plan offered to provide full pay to justices over age 70 who would retire.  If the older justices didn't retire, assistant justices (with full voting rights) would be appointed to sit with those existing justices.  This was a way FDR hoped to give the court a liberal majority that would side with his programs.

As it turned out, before FDR's proposal came up for a vote in Congress, two of the sitting justices came over to his side of the argument, and the Supreme Court narrowly approved as constitutional both the Social Security Act and the National Labor Relations Act.  So his plan (which failed in the US Senate) became unnecessary to his purposes.  

Roosevelt's "court-packing" scheme was unpopular. It was seen as an attempt to take away the independence of the judicial branch of government.     
You might be interested in
Before Unification - After Unification
poizon [28]
Hello there.
<span>Boundaries changes by Napoleon 
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the two types of drama that the Greeks performed at religious festivals?
lesya [120]

Answer:

A. comedy and tragedy

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the economies in the western territories develop so differently from the economies of the northeast and south?
erastovalidia [21]

Western territories had inexpensive land and abundant natural resources.

8 0
3 years ago
How did American society change because of the Vietnam war in terms of support, opposition and what lasting effects did it have
Debora [2.8K]
The United States had entered the conflict in Vietnam as the world’s superpower following its decisive victory over the Axis powers in World War II, but left Vietnam with a humiliating defeat, shockingly high casualties, American public sharply divided and its leaders uncertain of what lay ahead in foreign policy. The nation’s longest and most debilitating war – the only war the U.S. ever lost, had far-reaching consequences and impact on most aspects of American life from the economy, culture to domestic politics and foreign policy – some of which continue to do so today.The Vietnam War damaged the U.S. economy severely. The U.S. had poured some $168 billion into the war, but the real cost of the conflict was its impact on the economy.

After a few truly good years during 1962 – 1965 when there was low inflation, almost full employment and a favorable balance of trade<span>, </span>President Lyndon B. Johnson, who succeeded President Kennedy after his assassination in 1963, declared a “War on Poverty” through his “Great Society” programs while escalating the war in Vietnam at the same time.

However, his decision to finance both “guns and butter” – a major war and the Great Society simultaneously, without a significant increase in taxes unleashed an acceleration of inflation peaking at a runaway double-digit in mid 1970s.

Not until 1969 did President Johnson decided to introduce a 10% income tax surcharge, which is considered by many economists “too little and too late” and in turn also slowed down the economy. It’s worth mentioning that Congress would not allow that “surcharge” to be implemented until President Johnson agreed to cut $6 billion from domestic spending on Great Society programs. Despite their relative success, Johnson could have undoubtedly spent more on these programs had he not had to pay for the war abroad, which Martin Luther King, Jr. had referred to as a “America’s tragic distraction” at the beginning of Johnson administration

7 0
3 years ago
Britain's approach to interacting with other European countries during Queen Victoria's reign was called "splendid isolation" by
Orlov [11]

Answer:

A) Britain stayed out of any territory disputes between other European nations.

Explanation:

During the reign of Queen Victoria, Britain was easily the biggest and most powerful empire in the world, and it wanted to stay in that position. Therefore, its politicians worked hard to avoid taking sides in any of the disputes over territory on Europe's mainland. Taking sides might have led other European nations to join together against Britain, which would have weakened its position.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What country was established as a haven for slaves?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the Counter Reformation? A) a reform movement within the Lutheran Church following the Catholic Reformation B) a reform
    10·2 answers
  • Why was the catholic church considered the most powerful institution of the middle ages?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the name of the ideal or movement that dominated 1990s politics in texas?
    14·1 answer
  • 18 20 TIME REMAINING 01:58:57 Refer to the passage, How did the Statute of Laborers and the pressures of the Hundred Years War c
    15·2 answers
  • Why does the 15 amendment matter so much today
    10·2 answers
  • Why were boys valued above girls in ancient China?
    10·1 answer
  • Which type of market is the least likely to have an official currency?
    7·2 answers
  • What is the main reason that Texans lost the battle of the Alamo?
    15·1 answer
  • In the 1844 election, the phrase “Fifty-Four Forty or Fight!” referred to
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!