1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alchen [17]
3 years ago
11

GDP Per Capita (in U.S. dollars) Country GDP per Capita United Arab Emirates $29,100 Kuwait $22,800 Iran $8,100 Jordan $4,800 Su

dan $2,100 Why might there be such a drastic difference in the per capita GDP of these selected countries of Southwest Asia (the Middle East)? A) foreign invasion B) lack of urban areas Eliminate C) access to oil fields D) environmental disasters
History
2 answers:
Anvisha [2.4K]3 years ago
6 0
With the GDP per capita, this depends on the wealth and the population of a country. For somewhere such as the Arab Emirates, they have a small population, but a fair amount of wealth, so this then increases the GDP. The situation is similar with Kuwait. Iran has also been affected by War, meaning that some of the infrastructure will hav been destroyed, and that people would not be able to work and make money, which is then something that will have a direct impact on the GDP. With countries such as Jordan and Sudan, As far as I'm aware, they are relatively poor countries with a high population, meaning that the GDP will be lower and split between more people,therefore, meaning that it will be low. With regards to A). Iran is a country that has definitely been affected by this, following the war. B) A large majority of the countries that have been mentioned are also predominately desert, so where there is not people that are making money, this is something that is then not contributing to the GDP. Countries such as Kuwait and UAE also have large oil reserves, and this is something that can contribute to wealth hugely, and the smaller the population, the less people the GDP has to be spread between, and therefore, this increases it. With environmental disasters, these can have a huge impact, and the amount of money that is being made is also greatly reduced, and the expenditure is also increased, which is also something that can decrease the GDP. Hope this helps you!
kolezko [41]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

improving their education system

Explanation:

A good long-term solution- for Yemen, Syria, and all economically poor countries- would be improving their education system. Literacy and standard of living are closely linked all around the world.

You might be interested in
What is the significance of having three branches of government? Are there advantages if the responsibility to govern is shoulde
lisov135 [29]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The significance of having three branches of government is tremendous and can't be overemphasized. Some of the significance includes:

1. It makes the government effective and efficient.

2. Having three branches of government protects the rights of the citizens

3. It prevents arbitrary use of power by the government

Are there advantages if the responsibility to govern is shouldered only by one branch?

No there are no advantages. If any branch of government turned has all the power of the executive, judiciary, and legislative there will eventually be an arbitrary use of power in the long run, and this will affect the citizens and that society at large. This has been proven in human history in the past in the case of the dictator and absolute monarchy.

7 0
3 years ago
Which area experienced the biggest budget cut during Sam Houston's second term?
MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

Letter C. which is Military

7 0
3 years ago
1. What is the Christian Identity movement?
hammer [34]

Answer:

<em>The</em><em> </em><em>Christian</em><em> </em><em>Identity</em><em> </em><em>Movement</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>name</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>applies</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>variety</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>different</em><em> </em><em>religions</em><em> </em><em>cults</em><em> </em><em>all</em><em> </em><em>identitied</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em>racist</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>anti-government</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>extremist</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>right-wing</em><em> </em><em>groups</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>"</em><em>survival</em><em> </em><em>groups</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>"</em><em> </em><em>Christan</em><em> </em><em>identity</em><em> </em><em>cults</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>connected</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em>various</em><em> </em><em>unbiblical</em><em> </em><em>theological</em><em> </em><em>similarities</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>mostly</em><em> </em><em>centered</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>white</em><em> </em><em>supremacist</em><em> </em><em>mindset</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>seeks</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>replace</em><em> </em><em>national</em><em> </em><em>is real</em><em> </em><em>with</em><em> </em><em>British</em><em> </em><em>or</em><em> </em><em>American</em><em> </em><em>whites</em><em> </em><em>as</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>chosen</em><em> </em><em>people</em><em> </em><em>God</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>The</em><em> </em><em>racist</em><em> </em><em>theology</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>followed</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em>over</em><em> </em><em>5</em><em>0</em><em>,</em><em>0</em><em>0</em><em>0</em><em> </em><em>people</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>United</em><em> </em><em>States</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>The</em><em> </em><em>largest</em><em> </em><em>Christian</em><em> </em><em>Identity</em><em> </em><em>Movement</em><em> </em><em>group</em><em> </em><em>is</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>infamous</em><em> </em><em>Kurdish</em><em> </em><em>Klux</em><em> </em><em>Klan</em><em>.</em><em> </em>

8 0
3 years ago
Economics
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

IDK THE ANSWER TO THIS SORRY

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which European ruler called himself the "Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire"? A. King Francis I B. The Pope C. The Hapsburg Ruler
lakkis [162]

Answer:

Explanation:

pope ;)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is a requirement to run for governor of Texas?
    5·1 answer
  • What is a main principle of Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did labor change during the Industrial Revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • Question 2 (1 point)
    11·1 answer
  • What was Francis Bacon known for?
    7·1 answer
  • Lincolns main purpose in the Gettysburg address is to
    5·2 answers
  • Which of allowing enlightenment concepts was not presented by John Locke
    6·1 answer
  • Egypt and Israel continue to fight and bring even more instability to the Middle East. You are very concerned about this situati
    11·2 answers
  • “When a new hand, one unaccustomed to the business, is sent for the first time into the field, he is whipped up smartly and made
    10·1 answer
  • How does the women described in this account reflect the contrading expectations women experienced during the 1920s
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!