Answer: d. both Iris and Daphne will want to purchase Joss's services but Joss will not be willing to undertake the job.
Explanation:
Iris will want Joss's services but they will be unable to afford them as Iris is only willing to pay $500 whereas Joss wants $1,200 for the job.
The same goes for Daphne who is only willing to pay $800.
Both of them will therefore want to hire Joss but will be unable to.
Joss could however charge both of them their willingness to pay and then sum the cash up and give them both the research whilst still making a profit.
Answer: Law of diminishing marginal utility
Explanation: In simple words, law of diminishing marginal utility states that as a consumer consume more of a good or service then the marginal benefit he or she receives from the additional consumption keeps on decreasing.
In the given case, Jenny's excitement keeps on decreasing with every chocolate she receives after a certain point of time.
Hence we can conclude that the given case illustrates law of diminishing marginal utility.
Answer: Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
According to the law of supply, it states that there is a positive relationship between the price of a commodity and the quantity supplied of a commodity. This means that as the price of a commodity increases, as a result the quantity supplied of that commodity increases.
Therefore, any change occur in the prices of a commodity will affect the quantity supplied of a commodity not supply of a commodity.
A balance sheet is a summary of all of your business assets (what the business owns) and liabilities (what the business owes). At any particular moment, it shows you how much money you would have left over if you sold all your assets and paid off all your debts (i.e. it also shows 'owner's equity').
Answer:
B) opportunity costs.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the fortified benefits when a choice is made. It is the sacrificed option from a variety of possible choices. The value of opportunity cost is expressed as the cost of the next best alternative.
According to the economist, Joe made a loss because his opportunity cost would have yielded a better return. In evaluating the viability of a project, economists always consider the returns from the next best alternative. Joe would have made a profit if the returns from the sales of gold were higher than the 3 percent from a certificate of deposit. Because Joe opted for the gold, he missed the chance to earn from the certificate of deposit. In economics, he made a loss.
