1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zina [86]
3 years ago
8

The market price of cheeseburgers in a college town increased recently, and the students in an economics class are debating the

cause of the price increase. Some students suggest that the price increased because several burger joints in the area have recently gone out of business. Other students attribute the increase in the price of cheeseburgers to a recent increase in the price of calzones at local pizza parlors.
Everyone agrees that the increase in the price of calzones was caused by a recent increase in the price of pizza dough, which is not generally used in making cheeseburgers. Assume that burger joints and pizza parlors are entirely separate entities' that is, there aren't places that serve both cheeseburgers and calzones.

1. The first group of students thinks the increase in the price of cheeseburgers is due to the fact that several burger joints in the area have recently gone out of business.

On the following graph, adjust the supply and demand curves to illustrate the first groups explanation for the increase in the price of cheeseburgers.

I don't have the graphs because I don't know how to input it onto the question but I would like to know the change for each graphs supply and demand lines either to the left or right.

2. The second group of students attributes the increase in the price of cheeseburgers to the increase in the price of calzones at local pizza parlors.

On the following graph, adjust the supply and demand curves to illustrate the second group's explanation for the increase in the price of cheeseburgers.

3. Suppose that both of the events you analyzed above are partly responsible for the increase in the price of cheeseburgers. Based on your analysis of the explanations offered by the two groups of students, how would you figure out which of the possible causes was the dominant cause of the increase in the price of cheeseburgers?

A) If the price increase was small, then the supply shift in the market for cheeseburgers must have been larger than the demand shift.

B) If the equilibrium quantity of cheeseburgers increases, then the demand shift in the market for cheeseburgers must have been larger than the supply shift.

C) If the equilibrium quantity of cheeseburgers increases, then the supply shift in the market for cheeseburgers must have been larger than the demand shift.

D) Whichever change occurred first must have been the primary cause of the change in the price of cheeseburgers.
Business
1 answer:
Artemon [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: B) If the equilibrium quantity of cheeseburgers increases, then the demand shift in the market for cheeseburgers must have been larger than the supply shift.

Explanation:

1. An increase in the price of cheeseburgers is due to the fact that several burger joints in the area have recently gone out of business. This will shift the supply curve for cheeseburgers to the left, driving up the price of cheeseburgers and reducing the quantity.

2. An increase in the price of Calzones at local pizza parlors lead to an increase in the demand for Cheese burgers as cheese burgers and calzones are substitutes to each other. So, when price of calzones rise, consumers shift demand to cheeseburgers. This will lead to a rightward shift in the demand for cheese burgers as a result the price and quantity of cheese burgers increase.

3. A decrease in supply due to burger joints going out of business shift the supply curve to the left. Increase in the price of calzones increase demand for burgers shifts the demand curve to the right. Both these will increase the price of cheeseburgers but the effect on quantity cannot be determine as depends on the magnitude of the shift in the two curves.

If demand shifts more than supply, equilibrium quantity increases. If supply shifts more than demand, equilibrium quantity decreases.

Thus, B is correct.

You might be interested in
Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tick
erastova [34]

Full question:

In some states and localities, scalping is against the law although enforcement is spotty

A. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets.

B. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a strongly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets

Answer and Explanation:

A. For the first scenario, a weakly enforced antiscalping law would still allow the resale of tickets as it is not enforced properly. Therefore it's effect on price would remain as though there were no laws restricting scalping( scalping: price increase created by artificial shortage and bulk resale of tickets) . See the attached diagram for the supply and demand curve and price increase as a result of a weak antiscalping law

B. For the second scenario, scalping has no effect on price as antiscalping laws are strong and therefore there is no scalping. Price remains the same and does not change.

In diagram A for first scenario price increases from p1 to p2 and quantity decreases from q1 to q2 to indicate increase in price and quantity decrease for shortage respectively. This shows the effect of scalping on the market with weak antiscalping laws

In diagram B, price and quantity remain the same to show strong antiscalping laws

7 0
2 years ago
Abey​ Kuruvilla, of Parkside​ Plumbing, uses 1,220 of a certain spare part that costs ​$26 for each​ order, with an annual holdi
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

Answer:

Total cost = Total ordering cost + Total holding cost

Total cost = DCo/Q    + QH/2

Where D = Annual demand, Co = Ordering cost per order and H = holding cost per item per annum.

For 25 Order Size

Total cost = 1,220 x $26/25  + 25 x $25/2

Total cost = $1,268.80 + $312.50 = $1,581.30

For 40 Order Size

Total cost = 1,220 x $26/40  + 40 x $25/2

Total cost = $793 + $500 = $1,293.00

For 50 Order Size

Total cost = 1,220 x $26/50 + 50 x $25/2

Total cost = $634.40 + $625 = $1,259.40

For 60 Order Size

Total cost = 1,220 x $26/60  + 60 x $25/2

Total cost = $528.67 + $750 = $1,278.67

For 100 Order Size

Total cost = 1,220 x $26/100  +  100 x $25/2

Total cost = $317.20 + $1,250 = $1,567.20

b. The economic order quantity is 50 units because it reduces the total cost to $1,259.40

Explanation:

In this case, we need to determine the total costs based on different order sizes. Thus, economic order quantity is the order size that minimises the total cost.

4 0
3 years ago
A flower shop acquired 80 new customers last year. Costs in the marketing and sales areas were the following:
Anna11 [10]

Answer:

$1,215 per customer

Explanation:

Add all costs:

Marketing Costs = $1,200

Sales Costs = $9,000

Salaries = $87,000

Total = $97,200

$97,200 divided by 80 new customers = $1,215 per customer

6 0
2 years ago
One of the operations in the United States Postal Service is a mechanical mail sorting operation. In this operation, letter mail
sineoko [7]

Answer:

Detailed solution is given below:

8 0
3 years ago
In a portfolio problem, X1, X2, and X3 represent the number of shares purchased of stocks 1, 2, and 3, which have selling prices
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

The correct solution is "x_1 \leq 0.35 (x_1 + x_2 + x_3)".

Explanation:

According to the question,

Let,

For stock 1,

The number of shares to be purchased will be "x_1".

For stock 2,

The number of shares to be purchased will be "x_2".

For stock 3,

The number of shares to be purchased will be "x_3".

then,

The cumulative number of shares throughout stock 1 would be well over or equivalent towards the approximate amount of all the shares or stocks for the set limit.

i.e., x_1+x_2+x_3

Thus the correct equation is "x_1 \leq 0.35(x_1+x_2+x_3)".

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Exercise 8-07 At December 31, 2019, Pharoah Company Company had a credit balance of $18,100 in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.
    14·1 answer
  • Identify one advantage and two disadvantages of a monopoly.
    6·1 answer
  • While generally accepted accounting principles do allow flexibility, standards of _________, ________, and ________ must always
    15·1 answer
  • A ________ is a tax on the market value of oil produced in the state.
    8·1 answer
  • On December 1, 2013, Keenan Company, a U.S. firm, sold merchandise to Velez Company of Canada for 150,000 Canadian dollars (CAD)
    12·1 answer
  • superior Company provided the following data for the year ended December 31 (all raw materials are used in production as direct
    8·1 answer
  • The people described spent their money during different time periods. Label each of their scenarios as to whether they bought th
    8·2 answers
  • In regards to credit, what does capacity mean?
    14·1 answer
  • Looking at her report, jennifer realizes that her bank raised the rate on her last balance. Which federal legislation can she re
    7·1 answer
  • When a company evaluates the profit/potential of its customers, what group of customers would be considered as key targets?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!