Answer and Explanation:
I carried out the taste test with the members of my family, where everyone, with their eyes closed, had to taste pepsi and coke, tap water and bottled water, a bottle of expensive wine and a bottle of ordinary wine. After drinking from each pair, the participants had to express their considerations about each drink and say which was their favorite.
Regarding Coke vs. Pepsi the result was the most surprising. Among the 10 participants, 6 failed to recognize the products and chose pepsi as the drink that tasted the best. The surprising thing is that these participants had previously informed that they did not like Pepsi, which shows that the visualization of the product interferes with the reception of the product by the consumer.
Regarding tap water and bottled water the result was as expected. All participants showed preferences for bottled water, stating that tap water had a strong flavor from chemicals, such as chlorine, used in it.
Finally, the test with expensive wine and cheap wine had well balanced results and most participants were surprised by the taste of cheap wine, stating that they would drink again without any problem.
A is the answer for apex!!
Answer:
The <u>social influence model</u> suggests that Mori is more likely to disengage and wants to quit work because Natalie is no longer working there.
Explanation:
The social influence model refers to the way people are likely to change their behaviors and opinions in an attempt to comply with the demands of a social environment. This may happen in many ways, such as persuasion, leadership, obedience, peer pressure etc. There are people who will pretend to have agreed with someone, but will maintain their original opinions. There are those who will be influenced by someone they admire. And there are people who will completely change their opinion, and express that change publicly.
<u>The social influence model suggests that employees who have direct linkages with "leavers" will themselves become more likely to leave. That is why Mori is more likely to disengage and quit. Natalie being her only friend at work also makes it more difficult for her to stay without her.</u>
Answer:
This is an example of a mitigating factor.
Explanation:
In criminal law, a mitigating factor is an extenuating circumstance or condition that might lead the jury or judge to lessen a sentence or take into consideration because it explains in greater detail why a defendant might have committed a crime. The factor or circumstance usually makes it more understandable why the defendant took certain actions or why it is possible to have some sympathy or empathy for the defendant. An example would be if the defendant had been manipulated by someone else, for example, or if the crime was committed under duress of some sort, like being mandated to do something by your superiors at work.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
Upward mobility is the movement of an individual from a sociological classification to another better sociological classification. It is evident that dawn sociological life from her early beginning was quite not fancy enough as her parents were the busy type and not the rich type of parent in sociological classification in hierarchy, but evidently now, Dawn recently bought her first home and works as a lawyer, she came from a background that her parent worked soo hard to become who she is now so her sociological life changed from a quite busy sociological life to a life of affordability, what her parents couldnt afford for her, she can possibly afford for her kids now that her sociological life has changes since she became a lawyer.
