Adolescents do not show any sense of perception and competence in a cognitive process.As per Piaget children are bit simply incompetent thinkers than most adults. Piaget even expressed that the young ones think far way different than adults. Children should not be trained certain theories until they have outstretched the proper phase of comprehension or cognitive development.
The overturning of the "Separate but equal doctrine" was considered a major move towards ending the racial caste system in the United States. Thus, Option D is the correct statement.
<h3>Why was the "separate but equal" doctrine rejected?</h3>
The Supreme Court overturned decades of law when it ruled that the country's laws prohibiting equal access to racially-based education violated an equal protection provision of Article 14.
Thus, The overturning of the "Separate but equal doctrine" was considered a major move towards ending the racial caste system in the United States. Option D is the correct statement.
Learn more about "separate but equal" here:
brainly.com/question/16995413
#SPJ1
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Is the personal property, the possession.