Answer:
Nineteenth Century - Belgium had a colony in Africa: the belgian Congo. The Belgian leadership treated the native people of the Congo in an extremely brutal manner, most people were essentially slaves. Some workers were mutilated if they did not meet certain quotas, or if they "misbehaved".
Twentieth Century - France and Britain came to dominate several areas in the Middle East after the Ottoman Empire collapsed. The French Mandate in particular, created the countries of Syria and the Lebanon.
The problem was that the borders of these countries were created without regard for ethnic and religious differences.
For this reason, modern Syria and Lebanon are very conflictive countries (Syria is in a civil war, Lebanon had a civil war from 1975 to 1990) because of that.
Twenty-first century - The United States invaded Iraq in 2003 under the false claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction hidden in its territory. While the U.S. army managed to depose the former dictator, Sadam Hussein, the invasion caused the deaths of thousands of American Soldiers and Iraqi citizens, and Iraq continues to be a unstable country up to this day.
D The court ruled in favor of the protesters because the justices agreed with the intent and content of the protest.
They’re actually several..but one I would use is “they had an absolute monarchy, and most people were denied basic rights.”
Answer:
the British victory over their colonial rebels would have deprived other potential revolutionary movements in the Spanish New World of their inspiration. Instead of America going to war with Mexico in 1848, it is likely that the expanded British New World Empire would have gone to war against, and likely won against, the Spanish North American colony. As part of the victory treaty, the Brits likely would have claimed the same territory from the New World Spanish possessions which the U.S. claimed from Mexico. However, by this point slavery would have been abolished, and therefore not a primary motivation of that war.
Explanation:
The main differnce is option A The Byzantine government clearly placed the emperor as the highest religious authority, while the Roman government kept political and religious authority more separate.
The Western Roman Empire spoke Latin whilst the Byzantine Empire turned into Greek culturally and linguistically. The Roman Empire protected extra land than its jap counterpart. At its peak, the Roman Empire reached into regions of the British islands, Germania, Spain, parts of North Africa, and much of Asia Minor.
The Byzantine Empire and Western Europe firstly had been a part of the Roman Empire, but via the center a long time(medieval instances), they had been very extraordinary, despite the fact that they did percentage a few not unusual tendencies, but with the aid of the three hundred's, the Byzantine Empire had far exceeded Western Europe in exchange and economics and political solidarity.
The Byzantine Emperors, like the Romans, ruled with absolute power; however, they had power over the authorities and the church and were greater powerful than the Patriarch.
Learn more about Byzantine Empire here: brainly.com/question/1276486
#SPJ1
