<span>The privilege to allow the slaves to purchase their freedom was no longer available but allowed to enter into contracts. They were also prohibited from making complaints against their master. Masters are required to give them Sundays off, they could not separate young children from their mothers, and required to care for the old and disabled. Punishments was more severe in Louisiana’s Black code.
</span>
Answer:
i think is c
Explanation:
its the only one that really makes since
<span>The British were occupying Philadelphia for the winter. The American Army needed to keep an eye on them and prevent them from foraging in the countryside for food they needed
</span>
<span> After </span>World War<span> I, </span>Ottoman Empire<span> broke apart, with the Turks confined to Asia Minor (Turkey). Other </span>European colonies<span> broke away as well.
please return the favor and answer question in profile 20 or 10 points thanks
</span>
Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
