1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex777 [14]
3 years ago
14

How did the US Constitution differ from the Articles of Confederation?

History
2 answers:
KATRIN_1 [288]3 years ago
6 0

The US Constitution differed greatly from the Articles of Confederation. This is due to the fact that the US Constitution established a stronger central (aka federal) government.

Further Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was America's first constitution that lasted less than a decade. This constitution was then replaced by the US Constitution. One of the reasons that delegates decided to replace the Articles of Confederation when meeting at the Constitutional Convention was due to the fact that this government had a weak federal government. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not tax, struggled to raise an army to put down rebellions (like Shay's Rebellion), and could not pay off America's debt from the American Revolution.

To fix problems like this, delegates began to create a new US Constitution that addressed some of the problems of the Articles of Confederation. In this new constitution, the federal government was given the ability to tax, regulate interstate commerce, and coin money. This increase in federal power was not agreed upon by all, as debates between federalists and anti federalists greatly shaped the creation of this constitution.

Learn More:

Difference between federalists and anti federalists- brainly.com/question/13064045

Key Details:

Topic: American History, US Constitution, Articles of Confederation

Grade Level: 7-12

Keywords: Articles of Confederation, US Constitution,federal government

sertanlavr [38]3 years ago
5 0

The main differences of the US Constitution and the Articles of Confederation are:

  • The Articles of Confederation established a weak central government with only one branch because after the American Revolution, people feared that a strong government could lead to tyranny.
  • Under the US Constitution the federal government is strong and divided by three branches (executive, bicameral legislature, judicial), with a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power.
  • The US Constitution gives one vote per Representative or Senator, and the Articles of Confederation gave one vote to each state.
  • The US Constitution states that the Supreme Court is the judge of disputes between states, and under the Articles of Confederation the central government was not able to deal with disputes between states.
  • Under the Articles of Confederation the central government didn't had power to collect taxes, states owned that power, and in the US Constitution the federal government has the power to collect taxes.
  • Unanimous consent was needed for ratification under the Articles of Confederation, while in the US Constitution only 9 states are needed.

The addition of the Bill of Rights under the US Constitution where rights and liberties of the citizens are stated is also a great difference.

You might be interested in
And<br> D17.9) The two young British generals that led the forces in the French and Indian War were
trapecia [35]
I think it’s James Wolfe abs William Pitt don’t quote me on that
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was NOT a reason for a United States to look beyond its boundaries in the late nineteenth century?
enot [183]

Answer:

to establish military alliances with other nations.

3 0
2 years ago
The american colonial exponents of republicanism agured that a just society depends on
larisa [96]

Answer:

The answer is an ability to subordinate private interests to the benefit of all.  

Explanation:

Settling government obligations speaks to one essential way that we as a whole add to the benefit of everyone. The assessment framework completes various things. It is a methods by which government raise the income expected to finance open administrations. It is a methods for reallocating wage to diminish neediness and imbalance. Wild fish are a case of regular merchandise. They are non-excusable, as it is difficult to keep individuals from getting fish.

3 0
4 years ago
Description of dred scott v. sandford
soldier1979 [14.2K]

In dred scott v sandford the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens. The court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. This case was the most important slavery-related decision in the United States Supreme Court's history. case was argued 1856, decided 1857

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You are a Spanish
arlik [135]
I will sail the 7 seas
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the supporters of Manifest Destiny argue that US expansionism was not imperialism.
    7·2 answers
  • Why amendment 2 is important
    10·2 answers
  • All of the following are reason why George H.W. Bush was not reelected EXCEPT:
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a similarity between classical mesoamerican and south American civilization?
    10·2 answers
  • (Blank) was president as American society exploded into a cauldron of movements, riots, protests, and war.
    5·2 answers
  • Which country suffered the most severe damage to its land and structures during WWI?
    8·2 answers
  • What valid generalization can be made based on the information in this timeline?
    6·1 answer
  • What was Pequot Cultural language?
    11·1 answer
  • How does freedom of the press help maintain a democratic society?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the primary religion of enslaved persons in the Southern states?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!