Gap's cost of goods sold is $10,258 million and Cash paid to supplier is $10,447 million.
Let understand that Cost of good sold refers to amount of expenses incurred to produce the goods produced by a firm.
- The formulae for deriving the Cost of Goods Sold is {Beginning Inventories + Purchases – Ending Inventories}.
- Information given are <em>Purchased inventories $10,392, Ending inventories $2,131 and Beginning inventories $1,997</em>
<em />
Cost of goods sold = $1,997 + $10,392 - $2,131
Cost of goods sold = $10,258
- In conclusion, the amount of Gap's cost of goods sold is $10,258
Let understand that Cash paid to accounts payable refers to net amount paid to supplier of goods.
- The formulae for deriving the Cash paid to accounts payable is Beginning balance for 2015 + Purchases - Ending balance for 2015
Cash paid to accounts payable = $1,181 + $10,392 - $1,126
Cash paid to accounts payable = $10,447
- In conclusion, the amount of Gap's Cash paid to supplier is $10,447
Learn from similar solution here
<em>brainly.com/question/16805564</em>
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
Delegation is the term in accounting which is defined as the assignment of authority to some another person in order to carry out the particular activities. And the person or individual who delegate the work will remain accountable or responsible for the outcome or result of the work which is delegated.
So, in this case, Ruby need expertise of Katherine in writing a chapter and they signed a contract for the same but if Katherine delegates the work to Dana, then the delegation would not so effective as the duty involve the personal services.
Based on the amount that Jim deposited and the interest paid per year on the account, withdrawing in two equal amounts would require an amount of <u>$530 per year. </u>
<h3>How much should Jim withdraw per year?</h3><h3 />
Assuming the amount that can be withdrawn is x, the relevant formula would be:
(1,040 - x) x 104 = 100x
Solving for x gives:
108,160 - 104x = 100x
108,160 = 100x + 104x
108,160 = 204x
x = 108,160 / 204
= $530
Find out more on future value at brainly.com/question/16180669.
Answer:
a)
<em>The value added at each stage</em>
Stage Value added($)
1 1000
2 (2000-1000) = 1,000
3 (6,000- 2000) = 4,000
4 (10,000 - 6,000) = 4,000
b)
The amount by GDP is increased = $10,000
c) Reduce GDP
Explanation:
Gross domestic product (GDP) which is the total market value of all the final goods and services produced in a country over a given period of time. The GDP can be calculated using the value added approach.
Here the GPD figure is ascertained by summing the amount of additional value created by each factor of production at each stage of the production process of the final product.
a)
<em>The value added at each stage</em>
Stage Value added($)
1 1000
2 (2000-1000) = 1,000
3 (6,000- 2000) = 4,000
4 (10,000 - 6,000) = 4,000
b)
The amount by GDP is increased = $10,000 which is the total value added or the market value of the final goods
c)
If the lumber were imported it would be deducted from the value of export and thus reduce GDP. Remember that GDP is the market value of all good and service produced within a given country over certain period of time .
Answer:
1. The Fed uses open market operations to increase the money supply, thus lowering interest rates and stimulating investment.
Expansionary monetary policy is done to stimulate economy by increasing money supply. It lowers interest rates and leaves more money for consumption and investment.
2. Increased aggregate demand leads to some higher prices and more total output.
Increased AG will lead to prices being higher in response. This would spur producers to produce more thereby increasing output.
3. Sticky input prices adjust to inflation.
Input prices will rise overtime to match the increase in prices.
4. Producers lay off some workers in response to higher input prices, causing a decrease in aggregate supply.
When the inputs rise, production becomes more expensive so producers will have to lay off workers to maintain profitability. They will also supply less goods as a result.
5. In the long run, equilibrium returns to the same initial production level.
In the long run therefore, the reduction in AS leads to production returning to pre-monetary policy figures.
