Answer:
In this situation, participants:
Believed in diagnostic information but they simply didn't pay attention to the base rate.
Explanation:
- Kahneman and Tversky did experiments in the fields of psychology.
- The base rate is such a phenomenon in the field of psychology which tells us that certain number of population will show certain characteristics. So, in our case the base rate is the information that proportion of people in the overall population who are lawyers or engineers.
- But the participants made judgments about the likelihood that certain people with certain characteristics were lawyers or engineers.
The changes that is happening on Amber is the development of
secondary sex characteristics in which an individual undergoing puberty is
likely to have changes in his or her private body parts in the body such as the
breast and pubic area in some sensitive parts.
tonka is the answer of your question
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
