Answer:
4,782,969
Step-by-step explanation:
9^7
Written in expanded form = 9 times 9 times 9 times 9 times 9 times 9 times 9
= 9 × 9 × 9 × 9 × 9 × 9 × 9
= 4,782,969
9^7 means multiplying 9 in 7 places
9^7 = 4,782,969
The required answer is 
.
<u>what is a power rule for exponents ?</u>
is known as the power rule for exponents. Exponent times power is how you raise a number with an exponent to a power.
A number's exponent demonstrates how many times we are multiplying a given number by itself. 3^4, for instance, indicates that we are multiplying 3 by four. 3*3*3*3 is its expanded form. The power of a number is another name for an exponent. It could be an integer, a fraction, a negative integer, or a decimal.
Here, we have used the rule
To learn more about the power rule for exponents from the given link
brainly.com/question/819893
#SPJ1
1. The information given in the problem above, is:
- Austin purchases <span>2/3 of a pound of yum yum treats.
- Y</span><span>um yum treats are $6.00 per pound (1 pound=$6.00).
2. Keeping this on mind you have: If 1 pound of </span>yum yum treats is $6.00, how much is 2/3 of a pound?
1 pound------------$6.00
2/3 of a pound----x
x=(2/3)(6.00)/1
x=(2/3)(6.00)
x=12/3
x=$4.00
<span>
Therefore: How much does Austin pay?
</span>
The answer is: Austin pays $4.00.
Answer:
A:28/500
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1 - If method I is used, population of generalization will include all those people who may have varying exercising habits or routines. They may or may not have a regular excersing habit. In his case sample is taken from a more diverse population
2 - Population of generalization will include people who will have similar excersing routines and habits if method II is used since sample is choosen from a specific population
Step-by-step explanation:
Past excercising habits may affect the change in intensity to a targeted excersise in different manner. So in method I a greater diversity is included and result of excersing with or without a trainer will account for greater number of variables than method II.
